ASSESSMENT OF THREE HEAT TREATED SINGLE FILE SYSTEMS IN GUTTA-PERCHA REMOVAL USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (AN IN VITRO STUDY)

Mohamed Elnagar, Ahmed Mobarak, Amr Abdallah
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF THREE HEAT TREATED SINGLE FILE SYSTEMS IN GUTTA-PERCHA REMOVAL USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (AN IN VITRO STUDY)","authors":"Mohamed Elnagar, Ahmed Mobarak, Amr Abdallah","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2022.144389.1291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Absolute removal of the defective root filling material and regaining apical patency is the primary factor of endodontic retreatment success. AIM OF THE STUDY: Assessment of the ability of Reciproc R25 (VDW, Munich, Germany), Reciproc blue (VDW, Munich, Germany) and the XP-endo shaper (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) thermally treated rotary files in removing of the root filling material from oval shaped canals using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty six extracted single canaled human mandibular premolar teeth were prepared chemo-mechanically using Revo-S rotary file system (Micro-Mega, France) and obturated. The teeth were randomly allocated into three groups (n=12 each) depending on files used in retreatment procedure as follow: Group I: Reciproc R25, Group II: Reciproc blue, Group III: XP-endo shaper. Pre and post retreatment scans were done using CBCT to calculate the volume of the remaining gutta percha by using computer software (Osirix lite). Time consumed by each file was recoded until gutta percha was completely removed. RESULTS: All used files were not able to remove the entire root filling material from the canals. No statistically significant differences (P> 0.05) in residual gutta percha were detected between the groups, the percentage of reduction was 88.87 % in (Group Ⅰ ), 92.22 % in (Group Ⅱ ), and 88.60 % in (Group Ⅲ ). The XP-endo shaper required more time with statistically significant difference than the Reciproc groups in gutta percha removal. CONCLUSION: All systems removed the root filling material from oval shaped canals effectively. Both reciproc systems were faster than XP-endo shaper in gutta percha removal.","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2022.144389.1291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Absolute removal of the defective root filling material and regaining apical patency is the primary factor of endodontic retreatment success. AIM OF THE STUDY: Assessment of the ability of Reciproc R25 (VDW, Munich, Germany), Reciproc blue (VDW, Munich, Germany) and the XP-endo shaper (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) thermally treated rotary files in removing of the root filling material from oval shaped canals using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty six extracted single canaled human mandibular premolar teeth were prepared chemo-mechanically using Revo-S rotary file system (Micro-Mega, France) and obturated. The teeth were randomly allocated into three groups (n=12 each) depending on files used in retreatment procedure as follow: Group I: Reciproc R25, Group II: Reciproc blue, Group III: XP-endo shaper. Pre and post retreatment scans were done using CBCT to calculate the volume of the remaining gutta percha by using computer software (Osirix lite). Time consumed by each file was recoded until gutta percha was completely removed. RESULTS: All used files were not able to remove the entire root filling material from the canals. No statistically significant differences (P> 0.05) in residual gutta percha were detected between the groups, the percentage of reduction was 88.87 % in (Group Ⅰ ), 92.22 % in (Group Ⅱ ), and 88.60 % in (Group Ⅲ ). The XP-endo shaper required more time with statistically significant difference than the Reciproc groups in gutta percha removal. CONCLUSION: All systems removed the root filling material from oval shaped canals effectively. Both reciproc systems were faster than XP-endo shaper in gutta percha removal.
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估三种热处理单锉系统在去除牙胶方面的效果(体外研究)
完全清除缺损的根管充填材料,恢复根尖通畅是根管再治疗成功的首要因素。研究目的:评估Reciproc R25 (VDW,慕尼黑,德国)、Reciproc blue (VDW,慕尼黑,德国)和XP-endo shaper (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds,瑞士)热处理旋转锉在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中去除椭圆形根管充填材料的能力。材料与方法:采用Revo-S旋转文件系统(Micro-Mega, France)化学机械法制备36颗拔除的人下颌前磨牙,并进行封闭。根据再治疗过程中使用的锉刀,将牙随机分为3组,每组12颗:I组:Reciproc R25, II组:Reciproc blue, III组:XP-endo shaper。再治疗前后采用CBCT扫描,利用计算机软件(Osirix lite)计算剩余杜胶的体积。每个文件所消耗的时间被重新编码,直到杜胶被完全删除。结果:所有使用的锉都不能将根管充填材料全部从根管中取出。各组间杜胶残留量差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05),分别为88.87%(Ⅰ组)、92.22%(Ⅱ组)和88.60%(Ⅲ组)。与Reciproc组相比,XP-endo塑形器组需要更多的时间去除杜仲胶,差异有统计学意义。结论:所有系统均能有效去除椭圆根管中的根充填物。这两种系统在去除杜仲胶方面都比XP-endo塑形器快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信