{"title":"The Effect of Different Dentin Desensitizers and Self- Adhesive Resin Cement on Shear Bond Strength: In Vitro Study","authors":"Işıl Keçik Büyükhatipoğlu, Derya Gürsel Sürmelioğlu","doi":"10.58600/eurjther1892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength of different dentin desensitizers and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin surfaces.\nMethods: The flat dentin surfaces of 72 wisdom molar teeth were randomly divided into six groups for bond strength analysis (n=12): Group CP: No desensitizer + Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, Group CM: No desensitizer+ Primer A&B+ Multilink N, Group TP: Tokuyama Shield Force+ Primer II A&B + Panavia F 2.0, Group TM: Tokuyama Shield Force + Primer A&B+ Multilink N, Group UP: Universal dentin sealant + Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0 and Group UM: Universal dentin sealent + Primer A&B+ Multilink N. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). ANOVA test was used to detect significant differences at a p < 0.05.\nResults: The results indicated that bond strength values varied according to the desensitizing and resin cement materials (p < 0.05). The Tokuyama Shield Force desensitizer did not affect the bond strength of the resin cements to dentin (p > 0.05).\nConclusion: The different types of dentin desensitizer applications affected on the shear bond strength results of the self-adhesive resin cements.","PeriodicalId":42642,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength of different dentin desensitizers and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin surfaces.
Methods: The flat dentin surfaces of 72 wisdom molar teeth were randomly divided into six groups for bond strength analysis (n=12): Group CP: No desensitizer + Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, Group CM: No desensitizer+ Primer A&B+ Multilink N, Group TP: Tokuyama Shield Force+ Primer II A&B + Panavia F 2.0, Group TM: Tokuyama Shield Force + Primer A&B+ Multilink N, Group UP: Universal dentin sealant + Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0 and Group UM: Universal dentin sealent + Primer A&B+ Multilink N. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). ANOVA test was used to detect significant differences at a p < 0.05.
Results: The results indicated that bond strength values varied according to the desensitizing and resin cement materials (p < 0.05). The Tokuyama Shield Force desensitizer did not affect the bond strength of the resin cements to dentin (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: The different types of dentin desensitizer applications affected on the shear bond strength results of the self-adhesive resin cements.
目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较不同的牙本质脱敏剂和自粘树脂水泥与牙本质表面的结合强度。方法:将72颗智慧磨牙牙本质平面随机分为6组(n=12)进行结合强度分析:CP组:无脱敏剂+ Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, CM组:无脱敏剂+ Primer A&B+ Multilink n, TP组:Tokuyama Shield Force+ Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, TM组:Tokuyama Shield Force+ Primer A&B+ Multilink n, UP组:通用牙本质密封剂+ Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, UM组:万能牙本质密封剂+底漆A&B+ Multilink N.剪切粘结强度试验采用万能试验机(0.5 mm/min)。采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验,p < 0.05。结果:黏结强度值因脱敏材料和树脂水泥材料的不同而不同(p < 0.05)。Tokuyama盾构力脱敏剂对牙本质黏结强度无显著影响(p > 0.05)。结论:不同类型牙本质脱敏剂的应用对自粘树脂胶结物的剪切粘结强度有影响。