A social and ethical game-changer? An empirical ethics study of CRISPR in the salmon farming industry

IF 2.2 2区 哲学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
H. Winther, T. Blix, Lotte Holm, A. Myhr, Bjørn Myskja
{"title":"A social and ethical game-changer? An empirical ethics study of CRISPR in the salmon farming industry","authors":"H. Winther, T. Blix, Lotte Holm, A. Myhr, Bjørn Myskja","doi":"10.1177/09632719231196543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The genome editing technology CRISPR is described as a technological game-changer because of its flexibility and precision, and as an ethical game-changer due to its ability to engineer traits in living organisms without crossing species, avoiding a significant objection to genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In salmon farming, applications of CRISPR in breeding hold the promise of handling environmental and fish welfare challenges yet require social acceptance. Adopting an empirical bioethics framework, this stakeholder interview study shows that respecting species borders is important, but not decisive, for acceptance among Norwegian stakeholders. The main objections are based on moral reflections about technology use and outcomes. These reflections combine principles and pragmatic deliberations of moral costs and benefits, suggesting that CRISPR applications with environmentally and ethically significant benefits can be socially acceptable. This indicates that the game-changing potential of CRISPR relies on the characteristics of the editing and the context in which the application takes place.","PeriodicalId":47200,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Values","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Values","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09632719231196543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The genome editing technology CRISPR is described as a technological game-changer because of its flexibility and precision, and as an ethical game-changer due to its ability to engineer traits in living organisms without crossing species, avoiding a significant objection to genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In salmon farming, applications of CRISPR in breeding hold the promise of handling environmental and fish welfare challenges yet require social acceptance. Adopting an empirical bioethics framework, this stakeholder interview study shows that respecting species borders is important, but not decisive, for acceptance among Norwegian stakeholders. The main objections are based on moral reflections about technology use and outcomes. These reflections combine principles and pragmatic deliberations of moral costs and benefits, suggesting that CRISPR applications with environmentally and ethically significant benefits can be socially acceptable. This indicates that the game-changing potential of CRISPR relies on the characteristics of the editing and the context in which the application takes place.
改变社会和伦理的游戏规则?三文鱼养殖业中的 CRISPR 实证伦理研究
基因组编辑技术CRISPR因其灵活性和精确性被描述为技术上的游戏规则改变者,同时也被描述为道德上的游戏规则改变者,因为它能够在不跨物种的情况下改造生物体的特征,避免了对转基因生物(GMOs)的重大反对。在鲑鱼养殖中,CRISPR在育种中的应用有望解决环境和鱼类福利挑战,但需要社会认可。采用经验生物伦理学框架,这个利益相关者访谈研究表明,尊重物种边界是重要的,但不是决定性的,挪威利益相关者之间的接受。主要的反对意见是基于对技术使用和结果的道德反思。这些反思结合了原则和对道德成本和收益的务实考虑,表明具有环境和伦理意义的CRISPR应用可以被社会接受。这表明,CRISPR改变游戏规则的潜力取决于编辑的特征和应用发生的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
36.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Environmental Values is an international peer-reviewed journal that brings together contributions from philosophy, economics, politics, sociology, geography, anthropology, ecology and other disciplines, which relate to the present and future environment of human beings and other species. In doing so we aim to clarify the relationship between practical policy issues and more fundamental underlying principles or assumptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信