Kant’s Derivation of Imperatives of Duty

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1017/s1369415423000420

Laurenz Ramsauer

引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the currently dominant reading of the Groundwork, Kant’s derivation of ‘imperatives of duty’ exemplifies a decision procedure for the derivation of concrete duties in moral deliberation. However, Kant’s response to an often-misidentified criticism of the Groundwork by G. A. Tittel suggests that Kant was remarkably unconcerned with arguing for the practicality of the categorical imperative as a decision procedure. Instead, I argue that the main aim of Kant’s derivation of imperatives of duty was to show how his analysis of the form of moral judgement is indeed presupposed in the four types of moral imperative that philosophers of his time recognized.

查看原文本刊更多论文

康德对义务要求的推导

根据目前对《基础》的主流解读，康德对 "义务要求 "的推导体现了在道德思考中推导具体义务的决策程序。然而，康德对 G. A. Tittel 经常被误认为是对《基础》的批评所做的回应表明，康德对论证绝对命令作为一种决策程序的实用性显然并不关心。相反，我認為康德引申出義務命令的主要目的，是要說明他對道德判斷形式的分析，如何確實預設了他那個時代的哲學家所認同的四種道德命令。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.