Middle Stone Age at Equatorial Guinea: Technical and use-wear analysis of lithic bifacial points

IF 0.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Alejandro Terrazas-Mata , Patricia Pérez-Martínez , Héctor Víctor Cabadas-Báez , Tamara Cruz-y-Cruz , Beatriz Menéndez-Iglesias , Jorge Rodríguez-Rivas , Lilit Pogosyan , Maximiliano Fero
{"title":"Middle Stone Age at Equatorial Guinea: Technical and use-wear analysis of lithic bifacial points","authors":"Alejandro Terrazas-Mata ,&nbsp;Patricia Pérez-Martínez ,&nbsp;Héctor Víctor Cabadas-Báez ,&nbsp;Tamara Cruz-y-Cruz ,&nbsp;Beatriz Menéndez-Iglesias ,&nbsp;Jorge Rodríguez-Rivas ,&nbsp;Lilit Pogosyan ,&nbsp;Maximiliano Fero","doi":"10.1016/j.anthro.2023.103213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Lithic industries during the Upper Pleistocene in Equatorial Guinea may be broadly included in the Central African Middle </span>Stone Age (MSA) Lupemban tradition. However, these industries present certain particularities related to their raw materials, and stone-knapping sequences. In the case of bifacial tools, bifacial points are commonly found with a cortical reserved proximal portion that keeps the cortex covering the base and part of both faces. Bifacial points made on thin stone slabs that keep the cortex on the center of one or both faces are also commonly found. This knapping technique gives the idea of unfinished preform artifacts. The edges, however, suggest that both points and other bifacial artifacts were used for some tasks. A sample of these tools was taken from the open-air Mabewele I site to decide whether the MSA points from Equatorial Guinea were finished artifacts, in spite of the preservation of their cortex. Petrographic studies and macro and microscopic analyses of the use-wear traces and residues from retouched edges were also performed. The analysis clearly shows that the Mabewele I bifacial artifacts were used for plant processing, among other activities. The results confirmed the fact that cortical reserved-base points with cortex on one or both faces were intentionally manufactured, finished tools, rather than unfinished preforms. The petrographic analysis also shows the schistous nature of raw material and explains the shape and stepped edges of bifacial knives, extending our understanding of the unique technical characteristics of the MSA in Equatorial Guinea. It also provides new insights into some of the hunter-gatherer's subsistence strategies in the Central African tropical rainforest at the end of the Pleistocene.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46860,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552123001103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Lithic industries during the Upper Pleistocene in Equatorial Guinea may be broadly included in the Central African Middle Stone Age (MSA) Lupemban tradition. However, these industries present certain particularities related to their raw materials, and stone-knapping sequences. In the case of bifacial tools, bifacial points are commonly found with a cortical reserved proximal portion that keeps the cortex covering the base and part of both faces. Bifacial points made on thin stone slabs that keep the cortex on the center of one or both faces are also commonly found. This knapping technique gives the idea of unfinished preform artifacts. The edges, however, suggest that both points and other bifacial artifacts were used for some tasks. A sample of these tools was taken from the open-air Mabewele I site to decide whether the MSA points from Equatorial Guinea were finished artifacts, in spite of the preservation of their cortex. Petrographic studies and macro and microscopic analyses of the use-wear traces and residues from retouched edges were also performed. The analysis clearly shows that the Mabewele I bifacial artifacts were used for plant processing, among other activities. The results confirmed the fact that cortical reserved-base points with cortex on one or both faces were intentionally manufactured, finished tools, rather than unfinished preforms. The petrographic analysis also shows the schistous nature of raw material and explains the shape and stepped edges of bifacial knives, extending our understanding of the unique technical characteristics of the MSA in Equatorial Guinea. It also provides new insights into some of the hunter-gatherer's subsistence strategies in the Central African tropical rainforest at the end of the Pleistocene.

赤道几内亚的中石器时代:石器双面点的技术和使用磨损分析
赤道几内亚上更新世时期的石器工业大体上可归入中非中石器时代(MSA)Lupemban 传统。不过,这些产业在原材料和石器制作序列方面存在某些特殊性。就二面形工具而言,二面形点通常具有保留皮质的近端部分,使皮质覆盖底部和两面的一部分。在薄石板上制作的双面凿也很常见,其皮质保留在一个或两个面的中心。这种敲击技术让人联想到未完成的预制件。然而,这些边缘表明,点和其他双面器物都用于某些工作。我们从露天的马贝韦莱一号遗址中提取了这些工具的样本,以确定赤道几内亚的 MSA 点是否是成品,尽管它们的皮层保存完好。此外,还对使用磨损痕迹和修饰边缘的残留物进行了岩相学研究以及宏观和微观分析。分析结果清楚地表明,马贝韦勒一号双面器曾用于植物加工等活动。结果证实,单面或双面都有皮质的皮质预留基点是有意制造的成品工具,而不是未加工的预制件。岩相分析还显示了原材料的片岩性质,并解释了双面刀的形状和阶梯状边缘,从而扩展了我们对赤道几内亚澳门金沙国际网上娱乐独特技术特征的了解。它还为我们了解更新世末期中非热带雨林中狩猎采集者的一些生存策略提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropologie
Anthropologie ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: First published in 1890, Anthropologie remains one of the most important journals devoted to prehistoric sciences and paleoanthropology. It regularly publishes thematic issues, originalsarticles and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信