Is Your Computer Lying? AI and Deception

IF 0.5 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Sophia Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s11841-023-00989-6

Noreen Herzfeld

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent developments in AI, especially the spectacular success of Large Language models, have instigated renewed questioning of what remains distinctively human. As AI stands poised to take over more and more human tasks, what is left that distinguishes humans? One way we might identify a humanlike intelligence would be when we detect it telling lies. Yet AIs lack both the intention and the motivation to truly tell lies, instead producing merely bullshit. With neither emotions, embodiment, nor the social awareness that leads to a theory of mind, AIs lack the internal referents on which to judge truth or falsity. When we are deceived by our computers, we need to look for the hidden agent who benefits from the deception.

查看原文本刊更多论文

你的电脑在说谎吗?人工智能与欺骗

人工智能的最新发展，尤其是大型语言模型的巨大成功，引发了人们对人类特征的新质疑。随着人工智能即将接管越来越多的人类任务，还剩下什么来区分人类?我们识别类人智能的一种方法可能是当我们发现它说谎时。然而，他缺乏真正说谎的意图和动机，而只是制造胡扯。由于既没有情感，也没有体现，也没有导致心智理论的社会意识，人工智能缺乏判断真假的内在参照。当我们被电脑欺骗时，我们需要寻找从欺骗中获益的隐藏代理人。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sophia PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sophia is now published by Springer. The back files, all the way to Volume 1:1, are available via SpringerLink! Covers both analytic and continental philosophy of religionConsiders both western and non-western perspectives, including Asian and indigenousIncludes specialist contributions, e.g. on feminist and postcolonial philosophy of religionSince its inception in 1962, Sophia has been devoted to providing a forum for discussions in philosophy and religion, focusing on the interstices between metaphysics and theological thinking. The discussions take cognizance of the wider ambience of the sciences (''natural'' philosophy and human/social sciences), ethical and moral concerns in the public sphere, critical feminist theology and cross-cultural perspectives. Sophia''s cross-cultural and cross-frontier approach is reflected not only in the international composition of its editorial board, but also in its consideration of analytic, continental, Asian and indigenous responses to issues and developments in the field of philosophy of religion.