Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review

Ben-tuo Zeng, Ying-hui Jin, Shu-dong Cheng, Yan-ming Ding, Ji-wei Du
{"title":"Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review","authors":"Ben-tuo Zeng, Ying-hui Jin, Shu-dong Cheng, Yan-ming Ding, Ji-wei Du","doi":"10.1101/2022.03.20.22272663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The administration of nursing assistants is closely associated with patient outcomes, but the current situation needs improvement. Studies evaluating intrahospital administration of nursing assistants are limited, and there is a lack of available evidence-based reviews in this field. This study aimed to identify existing literature on intrahospital nursing assistants' administration approaches.\nDesign: Scoping review. Search strategy: We searched fifteen electronic databases for English and Chinese articles published between January 2011 and March 2022. Publications on administration approaches, models and appraisal tools of intrahospital nursing assistants were included. Results: Thirty-six studies were eligible for the review with acceptable quality. We identified one administration model, nine administration methods, fifteen educational programs, and seven appraisal tools from the included studies. The frequency effect size analysis yielded 15 topics of the main focus at four levels, suggesting that included articles were mainly (33%) focused on the competency of nursing assistants, and the lectures were the most (80%) used strategy in quality improvement projects. Evidence from the studies was of low-to-moderate quality, indicating huge gaps between evidence-based research and management practice.\nConclusions: A series of practical intrahospital administration approaches was revealed, and fifteen primarily focused topics were identified. We should explore this area more thoroughly using structured frameworks and standardized methodology. This scoping review will help managers find more effective ways to improve the quality of care. Researchers may focus more on evidence-based practice in nursing assistant administration using the 15 topics as a breakthrough.","PeriodicalId":501260,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.20.22272663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The administration of nursing assistants is closely associated with patient outcomes, but the current situation needs improvement. Studies evaluating intrahospital administration of nursing assistants are limited, and there is a lack of available evidence-based reviews in this field. This study aimed to identify existing literature on intrahospital nursing assistants' administration approaches. Design: Scoping review. Search strategy: We searched fifteen electronic databases for English and Chinese articles published between January 2011 and March 2022. Publications on administration approaches, models and appraisal tools of intrahospital nursing assistants were included. Results: Thirty-six studies were eligible for the review with acceptable quality. We identified one administration model, nine administration methods, fifteen educational programs, and seven appraisal tools from the included studies. The frequency effect size analysis yielded 15 topics of the main focus at four levels, suggesting that included articles were mainly (33%) focused on the competency of nursing assistants, and the lectures were the most (80%) used strategy in quality improvement projects. Evidence from the studies was of low-to-moderate quality, indicating huge gaps between evidence-based research and management practice. Conclusions: A series of practical intrahospital administration approaches was revealed, and fifteen primarily focused topics were identified. We should explore this area more thoroughly using structured frameworks and standardized methodology. This scoping review will help managers find more effective ways to improve the quality of care. Researchers may focus more on evidence-based practice in nursing assistant administration using the 15 topics as a breakthrough.
医院护理助理的管理方法:范围综述
目的:护理助理的管理与患者的预后密切相关,但目前的情况需要改进。评估院内护理助理管理的研究是有限的,并且在这一领域缺乏可用的循证评论。本研究旨在找出现有文献对院内护理员的管理方法。设计:范围审查。检索策略:我们检索了15个电子数据库,检索了2011年1月至2022年3月期间发表的中英文文章。包括关于院内护理助理管理方法、模式和评价工具的出版物。结果:36项研究入选,质量可接受。我们从纳入的研究中确定了一种管理模式、九种管理方法、十五种教育计划和七种评估工具。频率效应大小分析得出四个层次的15个主要关注主题,表明纳入的文章主要(33%)关注护理助理的能力,讲座是质量改进项目中使用策略最多的(80%)。这些研究的证据质量低至中等,表明循证研究与管理实践之间存在巨大差距。结论:揭示了一系列实用的院内管理方法,并确定了15个主要关注的主题。我们应该使用结构化框架和标准化方法更彻底地探索这一领域。这种范围审查将帮助管理人员找到更有效的方法来提高护理质量。研究人员可以更多地关注护理助理管理的循证实践,以15个主题为突破口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信