Retirement Adjustment in Germany From 1996 to 2014

IF 2.7 2区 经济学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Georg Henning,Boo Johansson,Magnus Lindwall,Oliver Huxhold
{"title":"Retirement Adjustment in Germany From 1996 to 2014","authors":"Georg Henning,Boo Johansson,Magnus Lindwall,Oliver Huxhold","doi":"10.1093/workar/waab027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The context of retirement has changed over the last decades, but there is little knowledge on whether the quality of retirement adjustment has changed as well. Changes in retirement regulations and historical differences in resources may affect the quality of adjustment and increase inequalities between different socioeconomic groups. In the present study, we investigated historical differences in retirement adjustment by comparing cross-sectional samples of retirees from 1996, 2002, 2008, and 2014, based on the population-based German Ageing Survey. Adjustment was measured with three different indicators (perceived change in life after retirement, retirement satisfaction, adjustment difficulties). Retirement satisfaction was higher in later samples, but for the other two outcomes, there was no evidence for systematic increases or decreases in levels of retirement adjustment with historical time over the studied period. White-collar workers reported better adjustment than blue-collar workers did, and for two of three outcomes, this effect was stable over time. The white-collar workers’ advantage concerning retirement satisfaction, however, increased. We conclude that in Germany, at least for those who retire within the usual time window, adjustment quality has not changed systematically over the examined 18-year period. We only found mixed evidence for a growing social inequality in the retirement adjustment. However, as individual agency in choosing one’s retirement timing and pathway is increasingly restricted, social inequalities in well-being before retirement may increase.","PeriodicalId":46486,"journal":{"name":"Work Aging and Retirement","volume":"43 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Aging and Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The context of retirement has changed over the last decades, but there is little knowledge on whether the quality of retirement adjustment has changed as well. Changes in retirement regulations and historical differences in resources may affect the quality of adjustment and increase inequalities between different socioeconomic groups. In the present study, we investigated historical differences in retirement adjustment by comparing cross-sectional samples of retirees from 1996, 2002, 2008, and 2014, based on the population-based German Ageing Survey. Adjustment was measured with three different indicators (perceived change in life after retirement, retirement satisfaction, adjustment difficulties). Retirement satisfaction was higher in later samples, but for the other two outcomes, there was no evidence for systematic increases or decreases in levels of retirement adjustment with historical time over the studied period. White-collar workers reported better adjustment than blue-collar workers did, and for two of three outcomes, this effect was stable over time. The white-collar workers’ advantage concerning retirement satisfaction, however, increased. We conclude that in Germany, at least for those who retire within the usual time window, adjustment quality has not changed systematically over the examined 18-year period. We only found mixed evidence for a growing social inequality in the retirement adjustment. However, as individual agency in choosing one’s retirement timing and pathway is increasingly restricted, social inequalities in well-being before retirement may increase.
1996 - 2014年德国退休调整
摘要在过去的几十年里,退休的背景发生了变化,但关于退休调整的质量是否也发生了变化,我们知之甚少。退休法规的变化和资源的历史差异可能影响调整的质量,并增加不同社会经济群体之间的不平等。在本研究中,我们基于基于人口的德国老龄化调查,通过比较1996年、2002年、2008年和2014年退休人员的横断面样本,研究了退休调整的历史差异。调整用三个不同的指标(退休后生活的感知变化、退休满意度、调整困难)来衡量。在后来的样本中,退休满意度更高,但对于其他两个结果,没有证据表明在研究期间,退休调整水平随着历史时间的推移而系统性地增加或减少。据报告,白领工人比蓝领工人适应得更好,而且在三种结果中的两种中,这种效果随着时间的推移是稳定的。然而,白领在退休满意度方面的优势有所增加。我们的结论是,在德国,至少对于那些在通常的时间窗口内退休的人来说,在研究的18年期间,调整质量没有系统地改变。我们只发现了在退休调整中社会不平等日益加剧的混合证据。然而,随着个人选择退休时间和途径的能力日益受到限制,退休前福利的社会不平等可能会加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
21.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信