Association between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in stage I gastric cancer patients after curative resection.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastroenterology Report Pub Date : 2023-12-05 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/gastro/goad070
Qiuying Chen, Hua Xiao, Lu Zhang, Jingjing You, Zhe Jin, Bin Zhang
{"title":"Association between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in stage I gastric cancer patients after curative resection.","authors":"Qiuying Chen, Hua Xiao, Lu Zhang, Jingjing You, Zhe Jin, Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1093/gastro/goad070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on survival outcomes of patients with stage I gastric cancer (GC) after curative resection remains controversial. We aimed to determine whether these patients would benefit from AC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed stage I GC who underwent curative resection between November 2010 and December 2020. Patients were divided into AC and non-AC groups, then a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize the selection bias. Potential risk factors including age, pN stage, pT stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, histological type, and carcinoembryonic antigen level were used as matching covariates. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between groups using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 902 consecutive patients were enrolled and 174 (19.3%) patients were treated with AC. PSM created 123 pairs of patients. Before PSM, patients receiving AC had lower 10-year RFS rates (90% vs 94.6%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.035) than those who did not receive AC; the two groups had similar 10-year DSS rates (93.8% vs 95.0%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.240). After PSM, there were no statistical differences in the 10-year RFS (90.9% vs 93.0%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.507) or DSS rates (93.5% vs 93.6%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.811) between the two groups. Similar results were found in the stage IA and IB subgroups. Moreover, these findings were not affected by AC cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of AC could not provide survival benefits for patients with stage I GC after surgery and follow-up is thus recommended. However, large-scale randomized clinical trials are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":54275,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Report","volume":"11 ","pages":"goad070"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Report","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goad070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on survival outcomes of patients with stage I gastric cancer (GC) after curative resection remains controversial. We aimed to determine whether these patients would benefit from AC.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed stage I GC who underwent curative resection between November 2010 and December 2020. Patients were divided into AC and non-AC groups, then a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize the selection bias. Potential risk factors including age, pN stage, pT stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, histological type, and carcinoembryonic antigen level were used as matching covariates. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between groups using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: A total of 902 consecutive patients were enrolled and 174 (19.3%) patients were treated with AC. PSM created 123 pairs of patients. Before PSM, patients receiving AC had lower 10-year RFS rates (90% vs 94.6%, P =0.035) than those who did not receive AC; the two groups had similar 10-year DSS rates (93.8% vs 95.0%, P =0.240). After PSM, there were no statistical differences in the 10-year RFS (90.9% vs 93.0%, P =0.507) or DSS rates (93.5% vs 93.6%, P =0.811) between the two groups. Similar results were found in the stage IA and IB subgroups. Moreover, these findings were not affected by AC cycles.

Conclusions: The addition of AC could not provide survival benefits for patients with stage I GC after surgery and follow-up is thus recommended. However, large-scale randomized clinical trials are required.

一期胃癌根治后辅助化疗与生存的关系。
背景:辅助化疗(AC)对一期胃癌(GC)根治性切除后患者生存结局的影响仍有争议。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2010年11月至2020年12月间行根治性切除的病理证实的I期胃癌患者。将患者分为交流组和非交流组,然后进行1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,以尽量减少选择偏差。潜在危险因素包括年龄、pN分期、pT分期、淋巴血管侵犯、神经周围侵犯、肿瘤大小、组织学类型和癌胚抗原水平作为匹配协变量。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较各组无复发生存期(RFS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)。结果:共有902例患者连续入组,174例(19.3%)患者接受AC治疗。PSM产生123对患者。在PSM之前,接受AC治疗的患者的10年RFS率低于未接受AC治疗的患者(90% vs 94.6%, P = 0.035);两组10年DSS率相似(93.8% vs 95.0%, P = 0.240)。PSM后,两组10年RFS (90.9% vs 93.0%, P = 0.507)和DSS (93.5% vs 93.6%, P = 0.811)比较,差异均无统计学意义。在IA期和IB期亚组中也发现了类似的结果。此外,这些发现不受交流周期的影响。结论:对于I期GC术后患者,添加AC不能提供生存益处,因此建议随访。然而,需要大规模的随机临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Report
Gastroenterology Report Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Report is an international fully open access (OA) online only journal, covering all areas related to gastrointestinal sciences, including studies of the alimentary tract, liver, biliary, pancreas, enteral nutrition and related fields. The journal aims to publish high quality research articles on both basic and clinical gastroenterology, authoritative reviews that bring together new advances in the field, as well as commentaries and highlight pieces that provide expert analysis of topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信