Validation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the mental health literacy scale among the Saudi Arabian general population.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Nasser F BinDhim, Nora A Althumiri, Yasser Ad-Dab'bagh, Mohammed M J Alqahtani, Ahmad Kassab Alshayea, Sulaiman M Al-Luhaidan, Anton Svendrovski, Rashed Abdullah Al-Duraihem, Abdulhameed Abdullah Alhabeeb
{"title":"Validation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the mental health literacy scale among the Saudi Arabian general population.","authors":"Nasser F BinDhim, Nora A Althumiri, Yasser Ad-Dab'bagh, Mohammed M J Alqahtani, Ahmad Kassab Alshayea, Sulaiman M Al-Luhaidan, Anton Svendrovski, Rashed Abdullah Al-Duraihem, Abdulhameed Abdullah Alhabeeb","doi":"10.1186/s13033-023-00615-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to validate the Arabic Version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (Arabic-MHLS) among the Saudi Arabian general population, assessing its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and structural validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 700 Arabic-speaking Saudi adults were randomly selected to complete the electronic questionnaire in May 2023, which generated 544 participants. Data were coded and stored in the ZdataCloud research data collection system database. Test-retest reliability was assessed using a subsample of 48 participants who completed the questionnaire twice, with a one-week interval. Structural validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Arabic-MHLS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89). EFA revealed a four-factor model closely resembling the model identified in the Slovenian validation of MHLS, with factor loadings ranging from 0.40 to 0.85. The four factors included knowledge of mental health disorders, knowledge of help-seeking, knowledge of self-help strategies, and knowledge of professional help also showed good internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Arabic-MHLS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing mental health literacy in the Saudi Arabian general population. However, further research is needed to refine the measurement tool and understand the complex relationships between mental health literacy and other mental health-related concepts. This will contribute to the development of targeted interventions and policies aimed at improving mental health literacy and promoting mental well-being in the Saudi Arabian population and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"17 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00615-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to validate the Arabic Version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (Arabic-MHLS) among the Saudi Arabian general population, assessing its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and structural validity.

Methods: A total of 700 Arabic-speaking Saudi adults were randomly selected to complete the electronic questionnaire in May 2023, which generated 544 participants. Data were coded and stored in the ZdataCloud research data collection system database. Test-retest reliability was assessed using a subsample of 48 participants who completed the questionnaire twice, with a one-week interval. Structural validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA).

Results: The Arabic-MHLS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89). EFA revealed a four-factor model closely resembling the model identified in the Slovenian validation of MHLS, with factor loadings ranging from 0.40 to 0.85. The four factors included knowledge of mental health disorders, knowledge of help-seeking, knowledge of self-help strategies, and knowledge of professional help also showed good internal consistency.

Conclusion: The Arabic-MHLS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing mental health literacy in the Saudi Arabian general population. However, further research is needed to refine the measurement tool and understand the complex relationships between mental health literacy and other mental health-related concepts. This will contribute to the development of targeted interventions and policies aimed at improving mental health literacy and promoting mental well-being in the Saudi Arabian population and beyond.

在沙特阿拉伯普通人群中对阿拉伯语版心理健康素养量表进行验证和心理测试。
研究目的本研究旨在验证阿拉伯语版心理健康素养量表(Arabic-MHLS)在沙特阿拉伯普通人群中的有效性,评估其内部一致性、重测可靠性和结构有效性:2023 年 5 月,随机抽取了 700 名讲阿拉伯语的沙特成年人填写电子问卷,共产生了 544 名参与者。数据经编码后存储在 ZdataCloud 研究数据收集系统数据库中。对 48 名完成两次问卷的参与者进行了重测可靠性评估,间隔时间为一周。使用确认性因子分析(CFA)和探索性因子分析(EFA)对结构效度进行了检验:阿拉伯语-MHLS 显示出良好的内部一致性(克朗巴赫α = 0.87)和测试-再测可靠性(类内相关系数 = 0.89)。EFA显示出一个四因素模型,与斯洛文尼亚的MHLS验证模型非常相似,因素负荷在0.40到0.85之间。包括心理健康疾病知识、求助知识、自助策略知识和专业帮助知识在内的四个因子也显示出良好的内部一致性:阿拉伯语-MHLS 是评估沙特阿拉伯普通人群心理健康素养的有效而可靠的工具。然而,还需要进一步的研究来完善测量工具,了解心理健康素养与其他心理健康相关概念之间的复杂关系。这将有助于制定有针对性的干预措施和政策,以提高沙特阿拉伯及其他国家人口的心理健康素养,促进心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信