The oracle of D-A-Ch - Results of a Delphi Survey for the development of the evidence- and consensus-based tool "My Logbook".

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Liesa J Weiler-Wichtl, Alina Stefanie Kollmann, Verena Fohn-Erhold, Carina Schneider, Verena Rosenmayr, Rita Hansl, Maximilian Hopfgartner, Jonathan Fries, Kristina Herzog, Ulrike Leiss
{"title":"The oracle of D-A-Ch - Results of a Delphi Survey for the development of the evidence- and consensus-based tool \"My Logbook\".","authors":"Liesa J Weiler-Wichtl, Alina Stefanie Kollmann, Verena Fohn-Erhold, Carina Schneider, Verena Rosenmayr, Rita Hansl, Maximilian Hopfgartner, Jonathan Fries, Kristina Herzog, Ulrike Leiss","doi":"10.1055/a-2135-4337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present report describes the results of four delphi surveys conducted within the quality improvement project \"My Logbook\" which aims to translate evidence-based standards for psychosocial care in pediatric oncology into a practical consensus-based tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In four consecutive delphi surveys a total of n=153 international, multi-disciplinary experts rated the content, method, and design of the different booklets of \"My Logbook\" which a local expert group had conceptualized. After each survey, the feedback was incorporated, and the changes were evaluated in a final consensus vote by the quality assurance panel of the PSAPOH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While some surveys led to a review on a page level, most booklets as a whole reached the consensus-level of approval. Over the course of the surveys, any revisions and comments were incorporated in the booklets, and approval rates increased steadily.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The delphi surveys ensured the integration of multi-disciplinary, international expertise, uncovering issues such as language barriers and the need for a user manual that would not have been evident in first line . The incorporation of the input led to a continuous improvement of the tool, reflected in steadily increasing acceptance rates in the consecutive survey rounds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incorporation of the expert input as well as the additional development of a user manual resulted in a final version of the \"My Logbook\" apt for the interdisciplinary application in pediatric oncology in the entire DACH-region.</p>","PeriodicalId":17846,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Padiatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Padiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2135-4337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The present report describes the results of four delphi surveys conducted within the quality improvement project "My Logbook" which aims to translate evidence-based standards for psychosocial care in pediatric oncology into a practical consensus-based tool.

Methods: In four consecutive delphi surveys a total of n=153 international, multi-disciplinary experts rated the content, method, and design of the different booklets of "My Logbook" which a local expert group had conceptualized. After each survey, the feedback was incorporated, and the changes were evaluated in a final consensus vote by the quality assurance panel of the PSAPOH.

Results: While some surveys led to a review on a page level, most booklets as a whole reached the consensus-level of approval. Over the course of the surveys, any revisions and comments were incorporated in the booklets, and approval rates increased steadily.

Discussion: The delphi surveys ensured the integration of multi-disciplinary, international expertise, uncovering issues such as language barriers and the need for a user manual that would not have been evident in first line . The incorporation of the input led to a continuous improvement of the tool, reflected in steadily increasing acceptance rates in the consecutive survey rounds.

Conclusion: The incorporation of the expert input as well as the additional development of a user manual resulted in a final version of the "My Logbook" apt for the interdisciplinary application in pediatric oncology in the entire DACH-region.

D-A-Ch的神谕-德尔菲调查结果的证据和共识为基础的工具“我的日志”的发展。
目的:本报告描述了在“我的日志”质量改进项目中进行的四次德尔菲调查的结果,该项目旨在将儿科肿瘤学中心理社会护理的循证标准转化为基于共识的实用工具。方法:采用连续四次德尔菲调查,对153名国际、多学科专家对本地专家组构想的“我的日志”不同手册的内容、方法和设计进行评价。每次调查后,反馈被纳入,并由PSAPOH的质量保证小组在最终共识投票中评估更改。结果:虽然一些调查导致了一页级别的审查,但大多数小册子作为一个整体达到了共识级别的批准。在调查过程中,任何修订和评论都被纳入小册子,支持率稳步上升。讨论:德尔菲调查确保了多学科、国际专业知识的整合,揭示了诸如语言障碍和对用户手册的需求等问题,这些问题在一线并不明显。输入的结合导致了工具的持续改进,反映在连续调查轮的接受率稳步提高。结论:结合专家的意见以及用户手册的额外开发,形成了“我的日志”的最终版本,适用于整个dach地区儿科肿瘤学的跨学科应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klinische Padiatrie
Klinische Padiatrie 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Das Forum für wissenschaftliche Information in der Kinderheilkunde ausgewählte Originalarbeiten aus allen Bereichen der Pädiatrie Visite: Ihr Forum für interessante Krankengeschichten und außergewöhnliche Kasuistiken aktuelle Fortschritte in Diagnostik und Therapie jährliche Schwerpunkthefte: Ergebnisse der pädiatrischen Onkologie plus Medizin und Markt topaktuelle Informationen aus der Industrie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信