A comprehensive review of energy harvesting and routing strategies for IoT sensors sustainability and communication technology

Hesam Nejati Sharif Aldin , Mostafa Razavi Ghods , Farnoush Nayebipour , Masoud Niazi Torshiz
{"title":"A comprehensive review of energy harvesting and routing strategies for IoT sensors sustainability and communication technology","authors":"Hesam Nejati Sharif Aldin ,&nbsp;Mostafa Razavi Ghods ,&nbsp;Farnoush Nayebipour ,&nbsp;Masoud Niazi Torshiz","doi":"10.1016/j.sintl.2023.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effectiveness and dependability of network communication within the Internet of Things (IoT) depends on the energy-harvesting capabilities of IoT sensors. It is imperative to efficiently handle energy resources to fulfill computational requirements, ensuring optimal performance and continuous operation of IoT sensors across various applications. This investigation examines the challenges associated with energy harvesting in commonly used IoT sensors and their corresponding communication technologies. This encompasses wireless communication, cyber–physical systems (CPS), machine-to-gateway communication (M2G), wireless power transmission (WPT), and IoT infrastructure and protocols such as IPv6, 6LoWPAN, MQTT, CoAP. Furthermore, the study explores routing algorithms within the IoT network context, recognizing their crucial role in addressing challenges related to sensor battery lifespan and energy conservation. Challenges in energy resource management, which include considerations of sensor types, spatial relationships, and connection stability, are also discussed. The study investigates the energy consumption of different types of connections in an IoT network during data transfer, considering factors such as jitter, packet loss, overhead, congestion, distance between nodes, network protocol (MQTT), and data size (32MB). Two scenarios are explored: one where the minimum frequency band and data rate are fixed, revealing that Sigfox consumes more energy than others, while Bluetooth v5.0 is more energy-efficient; and another where the maximum frequency band and data size are fixed, showing that 5G consumes more energy, whereas NB-IoT is more energy-efficient. Finally, the research investigates the energy consumption increments for various network connections (2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, Bluetooth V5.0, Sigfox, WiMAX, LoRaWAN, Zigbee, and NB-IoT) as the frequency band and network data rate increase from minimum to maximum values, revealing increments within the range of 7% to 71%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21733,"journal":{"name":"Sensors International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666351123000323/pdfft?md5=ad17e08e5c4f9e265f913a4ebeb5811b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666351123000323-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666351123000323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness and dependability of network communication within the Internet of Things (IoT) depends on the energy-harvesting capabilities of IoT sensors. It is imperative to efficiently handle energy resources to fulfill computational requirements, ensuring optimal performance and continuous operation of IoT sensors across various applications. This investigation examines the challenges associated with energy harvesting in commonly used IoT sensors and their corresponding communication technologies. This encompasses wireless communication, cyber–physical systems (CPS), machine-to-gateway communication (M2G), wireless power transmission (WPT), and IoT infrastructure and protocols such as IPv6, 6LoWPAN, MQTT, CoAP. Furthermore, the study explores routing algorithms within the IoT network context, recognizing their crucial role in addressing challenges related to sensor battery lifespan and energy conservation. Challenges in energy resource management, which include considerations of sensor types, spatial relationships, and connection stability, are also discussed. The study investigates the energy consumption of different types of connections in an IoT network during data transfer, considering factors such as jitter, packet loss, overhead, congestion, distance between nodes, network protocol (MQTT), and data size (32MB). Two scenarios are explored: one where the minimum frequency band and data rate are fixed, revealing that Sigfox consumes more energy than others, while Bluetooth v5.0 is more energy-efficient; and another where the maximum frequency band and data size are fixed, showing that 5G consumes more energy, whereas NB-IoT is more energy-efficient. Finally, the research investigates the energy consumption increments for various network connections (2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, Bluetooth V5.0, Sigfox, WiMAX, LoRaWAN, Zigbee, and NB-IoT) as the frequency band and network data rate increase from minimum to maximum values, revealing increments within the range of 7% to 71%.

物联网传感器可持续性和通信技术的能量收集和路由策略的综合综述
物联网(IoT)内网络通信的有效性和可靠性取决于物联网传感器的能量收集能力。有效地处理能源资源以满足计算需求,确保物联网传感器在各种应用中的最佳性能和连续运行是必不可少的。本研究探讨了在常用物联网传感器及其相应的通信技术中与能量收集相关的挑战。这包括无线通信、网络物理系统(CPS)、机器到网关通信(M2G)、无线电力传输(WPT)以及物联网基础设施和协议,如IPv6、6LoWPAN、MQTT、CoAP。此外,该研究还探讨了物联网网络环境下的路由算法,认识到它们在解决与传感器电池寿命和节能相关的挑战方面的关键作用。还讨论了能源管理中的挑战,包括传感器类型,空间关系和连接稳定性的考虑。该研究调查了物联网网络中不同类型连接在数据传输过程中的能耗,考虑了抖动、丢包、开销、拥塞、节点之间的距离、网络协议(MQTT)和数据大小(32MB)等因素。研究了两种情况:一种是最小频带和数据速率是固定的,这表明Sigfox比其他产品消耗更多的能量,而蓝牙v5.0更节能;另一种是固定的最大频带和数据大小,表明5G消耗更多的能量,而NB-IoT更节能。最后,该研究调查了各种网络连接(2G、3G、4G、5G、蓝牙V5.0、Sigfox、WiMAX、LoRaWAN、Zigbee和NB-IoT)的能耗增量,随着频带和网络数据速率从最小值增加到最大值,其增量在7%到71%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信