Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need for Detecting Subjects with Great Need for Orthognathic Surgery.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1177/10556656231216833
Ali Borzabadi-Farahani
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need for Detecting Subjects with Great Need for Orthognathic Surgery.","authors":"Ali Borzabadi-Farahani","doi":"10.1177/10556656231216833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need (IOFTN) Identifies patients with greatest need for orthognathic surgery. This systematic review looks into the available evidence on prevalence of patients with great treatment need (IOFTN 4&5) who had orthognathic surgery in previous studies. Literature search of the major electronic databases was carried out for articles published between 2014 and September 2023, looking for \"Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need\",\"Orthognathic Surgery\",\"IOFTN\", \"Epidemiology\" and \"Dentofacial Deformity\". The prevalence of patients identified with IOFTN grades of 4&5 was calculated. A random-effect model was employed and the Forest and Galbraith plots were produced. The pooled prevalence estimate for subjects with IOFTN scores of 4&5 was calculated. The heterogeneity among studies was assessed with the I<sup>2</sup> statistics. In total, 14 retrospective studies conducted between 2015 and 2019 in 7 countries (UK, New Zealand, Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, Malaysia, Japan) were included, reporting on 1339 orthognathic patients. The sample sizes ranged from 30 to 200. Only 7 studies reported on the subcategories of the IOFTN for grades 1, 2&3. The prevalence of orthognathic patients with IOFTN scores of 4 & 5 ranged from 79% to 100%. The heterogeneity I<sup>2</sup> statistics was high (76%, random effects model) for 14 studies, but after removing 3 outlier studies reduced to zero. The pooled prevalence estimate for subjects with IOFTN scores of 4&5 was 93% (95% CI, 0.91-0.94%). According to this meta-analysis, IOFTN successfully identified 93% of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery with a great need for treatment (Grade 4 & 5). To enhance the identification of patients with well-compensated malocclusions, previous orthodontic treatment, or extreme occlusal deviations (e.g., proclination or retroclination of incisors), it would be advantageous to employ additional means alongside IOFTN for assessing orthognathic need in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"519-526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231216833","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need (IOFTN) Identifies patients with greatest need for orthognathic surgery. This systematic review looks into the available evidence on prevalence of patients with great treatment need (IOFTN 4&5) who had orthognathic surgery in previous studies. Literature search of the major electronic databases was carried out for articles published between 2014 and September 2023, looking for "Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need","Orthognathic Surgery","IOFTN", "Epidemiology" and "Dentofacial Deformity". The prevalence of patients identified with IOFTN grades of 4&5 was calculated. A random-effect model was employed and the Forest and Galbraith plots were produced. The pooled prevalence estimate for subjects with IOFTN scores of 4&5 was calculated. The heterogeneity among studies was assessed with the I2 statistics. In total, 14 retrospective studies conducted between 2015 and 2019 in 7 countries (UK, New Zealand, Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, Malaysia, Japan) were included, reporting on 1339 orthognathic patients. The sample sizes ranged from 30 to 200. Only 7 studies reported on the subcategories of the IOFTN for grades 1, 2&3. The prevalence of orthognathic patients with IOFTN scores of 4 & 5 ranged from 79% to 100%. The heterogeneity I2 statistics was high (76%, random effects model) for 14 studies, but after removing 3 outlier studies reduced to zero. The pooled prevalence estimate for subjects with IOFTN scores of 4&5 was 93% (95% CI, 0.91-0.94%). According to this meta-analysis, IOFTN successfully identified 93% of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery with a great need for treatment (Grade 4 & 5). To enhance the identification of patients with well-compensated malocclusions, previous orthodontic treatment, or extreme occlusal deviations (e.g., proclination or retroclination of incisors), it would be advantageous to employ additional means alongside IOFTN for assessing orthognathic need in this group.

检测急需进行正颌手术的患者的正颌功能治疗需求指数的系统评价和meta分析。
正颌功能治疗需求指数(IOFTN)确定最需要正颌手术的患者。本系统综述调查了在既往研究中有巨大治疗需求(IOFTN 4&5)的患者接受正颌手术的患病率的现有证据。对2014年至2023年9月间发表的主要电子数据库进行文献检索,检索内容为“Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need”、“Orthognathic Surgery”、“IOFTN”、“Epidemiology”和“Dentofacial deformation”。计算IOFTN分级为4级和5级的患者的患病率。采用随机效应模型,生成Forest图和Galbraith图。计算IOFTN得分为4和5的受试者的综合患病率估计值。采用I2统计量评估研究间的异质性。总共纳入了2015年至2019年在7个国家(英国、新西兰、伊朗、巴基斯坦、土耳其、马来西亚和日本)进行的14项回顾性研究,报告了1339名正颌患者。样本量从30到200不等。只有7项研究报告了IOFTN在1、2和3年级的子类别。IOFTN评分为4和5分的正颌患者的患病率从79%到100%不等。异质性2统计值为16%。IOFTN评分为4和5的受试者的总患病率估计为92% (95% CI, 0.91-0.94%)。根据这项荟萃分析,IOFTN成功识别了92%接受正颌手术的患者,这些患者有很大的治疗需求(4级和5级)。为了加强对补偿性错颌、既往正畸治疗或极端咬合偏差(如门牙前倾或后倾)患者的识别,在IOFTN的基础上采用其他手段评估该组正颌需求将是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信