An External Acetabular Alignment Guide Decreases Positional Variance.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Harsh Wadhwa, Shay I Warren, Kingsley Oladeji, Andrea K Finlay, James I Huddleston, Derek F Amanatullah
{"title":"An External Acetabular Alignment Guide Decreases Positional Variance.","authors":"Harsh Wadhwa, Shay I Warren, Kingsley Oladeji, Andrea K Finlay, James I Huddleston, Derek F Amanatullah","doi":"10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Certain patient and operative factors limit accurate estimation of acetabular component positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to determine whether an intraoperative external alignment guide decreases variance in acetabular component positioning.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adult patients who underwent primary THA from 2014-2018 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were navigation, robot-assisted surgery, and inflammatory, post-traumatic, or avascular arthritis. One surgeon used an external guide while the second surgeon resected osteophytes and utilized available anatomical landmarks for positioning. Anteversion and inclination, variance, \"safe zone\" positioning, operative time, and hip instability were assessed. Multivariable regression models were used to examine effects on primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>409 patients were included, of which 182 underwent component placement with landmarks only. Patients undergoing component placement with landmarks only were younger (p=0.002) and more often smokers (p=0.016). After multivariable risk adjustment, use of the external alignment guide was independently associated with 2.7° higher anteversion (CI: 1.6° to 3.8°) and smaller anteversion variance (-0.3, CI: -0.6 to 0.1) compared to landmarks only. It was independently associated with 3.2° higher inclination (CI: 2.0° to 4.4°), but there was no difference in inclination variance (-0.1, CI: -0.3 to 0.2). The external alignment guide was independently associated with a 14-minute shorter operative time (CI: 9.6 to 18.7) and smaller operative time variance (-0.9, CI: -1.2 to 0.6).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Use of anatomical landmarks alone was associated with increased likelihood of safe zone positioning but lower precision and longer operative time. While this study was limited by lack of randomization and its retrospective nature, an acetabular positioner may be preferable to palpable or visible anatomy alone for acetabular component placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Certain patient and operative factors limit accurate estimation of acetabular component positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to determine whether an intraoperative external alignment guide decreases variance in acetabular component positioning.

Materials and methods: Adult patients who underwent primary THA from 2014-2018 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were navigation, robot-assisted surgery, and inflammatory, post-traumatic, or avascular arthritis. One surgeon used an external guide while the second surgeon resected osteophytes and utilized available anatomical landmarks for positioning. Anteversion and inclination, variance, "safe zone" positioning, operative time, and hip instability were assessed. Multivariable regression models were used to examine effects on primary and secondary outcomes.

Results: 409 patients were included, of which 182 underwent component placement with landmarks only. Patients undergoing component placement with landmarks only were younger (p=0.002) and more often smokers (p=0.016). After multivariable risk adjustment, use of the external alignment guide was independently associated with 2.7° higher anteversion (CI: 1.6° to 3.8°) and smaller anteversion variance (-0.3, CI: -0.6 to 0.1) compared to landmarks only. It was independently associated with 3.2° higher inclination (CI: 2.0° to 4.4°), but there was no difference in inclination variance (-0.1, CI: -0.3 to 0.2). The external alignment guide was independently associated with a 14-minute shorter operative time (CI: 9.6 to 18.7) and smaller operative time variance (-0.9, CI: -1.2 to 0.6).

Discussion: Use of anatomical landmarks alone was associated with increased likelihood of safe zone positioning but lower precision and longer operative time. While this study was limited by lack of randomization and its retrospective nature, an acetabular positioner may be preferable to palpable or visible anatomy alone for acetabular component placement.

髋臼外对准引导器减少位置方差。
引言:在全髋关节置换术中,某些患者和手术因素限制了髋臼假体定位的准确估计。本研究旨在确定术中外对齐指南是否能减少髋臼假体定位的差异。材料和方法:回顾性分析2014-2018年接受原发性THA治疗的成年患者。排除标准为导航、机器人辅助手术、炎症性、创伤后或无血管性关节炎。一名外科医生使用外部引导,而另一名外科医生切除骨赘并利用可用的解剖标志进行定位。评估前倾和倾斜度、方差、“安全区”定位、手术时间和髋关节不稳定性。多变量回归模型用于检验对主要和次要结局的影响。结果:纳入409例患者,其中182例仅行地标性植入。接受地标性置入术的患者年龄较小(p=0.002),吸烟者较多(p=0.016)。在多变量风险调整后,与仅使用路标相比,使用外部对齐指南与2.7°高的前倾(CI: 1.6°至3.8°)和较小的前倾方差(-0.3,CI: -0.6至0.1)独立相关。它与高3.2°的倾斜度(CI: 2.0°至4.4°)独立相关,但倾斜度方差无差异(-0.1,CI: -0.3至0.2)。外对齐指南与缩短14分钟手术时间(CI: 9.6 ~ 18.7)和减小手术时间方差(-0.9,CI: -1.2 ~ 0.6)独立相关。讨论:单独使用解剖标志与安全区定位的可能性增加有关,但精度较低,手术时间较长。虽然这项研究受到缺乏随机化和回顾性性质的限制,但髋臼定位器可能比单纯的可触及或可见解剖更适合髋臼假体放置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信