Multicenter Study of the Utility of Convolutional Neural Network and Transformer Models for the Detection and Segmentation of Meningiomas.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xin Ma, Lingxiao Zhao, Shijie Dang, Yajing Zhao, Yiping Lu, Xuanxuan Li, Peng Li, Yibo Chen, Nan Mei, Bo Yin, Daoying Geng
{"title":"Multicenter Study of the Utility of Convolutional Neural Network and Transformer Models for the Detection and Segmentation of Meningiomas.","authors":"Xin Ma, Lingxiao Zhao, Shijie Dang, Yajing Zhao, Yiping Lu, Xuanxuan Li, Peng Li, Yibo Chen, Nan Mei, Bo Yin, Daoying Geng","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and practicality of using models like convolutional neural network and transformer in detecting and precise segmenting meningioma from magnetic resonance images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study on T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced images of 523 meningioma patients from 3 centers between 2010 and 2020. A total of 373 cases split 8:2 for training and validation. Three independent test sets were built based on the remaining 150 cases. Six convolutional neural network detection models trained via transfer learning were evaluated using 4 metrics and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Detected images were used for segmentation. Three segmentation models were trained for meningioma segmentation and were evaluated via 4 metrics. In 3 test sets, intraclass consistency values were used to evaluate the consistency of detection and segmentation models with manually annotated results from 3 different levels of radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average accuracies of the detection model in the 3 test sets were 97.3%, 93.5%, and 96.0%, respectively. The model of segmentation showed mean Dice similarity coefficient values of 0.884, 0.834, and 0.892, respectively. Intraclass consistency values showed that the results of detection and segmentation models were highly consistent with those of intermediate and senior radiologists and lowly consistent with those of junior radiologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed deep learning system exhibits advanced performance comparable with intermediate and senior radiologists in meningioma detection and segmentation. This system could potentially significantly improve the efficiency of the detection and segmentation of meningiomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":"480-490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and practicality of using models like convolutional neural network and transformer in detecting and precise segmenting meningioma from magnetic resonance images.

Methods: The retrospective study on T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced images of 523 meningioma patients from 3 centers between 2010 and 2020. A total of 373 cases split 8:2 for training and validation. Three independent test sets were built based on the remaining 150 cases. Six convolutional neural network detection models trained via transfer learning were evaluated using 4 metrics and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Detected images were used for segmentation. Three segmentation models were trained for meningioma segmentation and were evaluated via 4 metrics. In 3 test sets, intraclass consistency values were used to evaluate the consistency of detection and segmentation models with manually annotated results from 3 different levels of radiologists.

Results: The average accuracies of the detection model in the 3 test sets were 97.3%, 93.5%, and 96.0%, respectively. The model of segmentation showed mean Dice similarity coefficient values of 0.884, 0.834, and 0.892, respectively. Intraclass consistency values showed that the results of detection and segmentation models were highly consistent with those of intermediate and senior radiologists and lowly consistent with those of junior radiologists.

Conclusions: The proposed deep learning system exhibits advanced performance comparable with intermediate and senior radiologists in meningioma detection and segmentation. This system could potentially significantly improve the efficiency of the detection and segmentation of meningiomas.

卷积神经网络和变压器模型在脑膜瘤检测和分割中的多中心应用研究。
目的:探讨卷积神经网络、变压器等模型在磁共振图像脑膜瘤检测和精确分割中的有效性和实用性。方法:对2010 ~ 2020年3个中心523例脑膜瘤患者的t1加权和增强图像进行回顾性研究。共373例,分成8:2进行训练和验证。基于剩余的150例,建立了三个独立的测试集。通过迁移学习训练的6个卷积神经网络检测模型使用4个指标和接收者工作特征分析进行评估。使用检测到的图像进行分割。对三种分割模型进行脑膜瘤分割训练,并通过4个指标进行评价。在3个测试集中,使用类内一致性值来评估检测和分割模型与来自3个不同级别放射科医生的人工注释结果的一致性。结果:3个测试集检测模型的平均准确率分别为97.3%、93.5%和96.0%。分割模型的Dice相似系数均值分别为0.884、0.834和0.892。类内一致性值表明,检测和分割模型的结果与中高级放射科医师的结果高度一致,与初级放射科医师的结果一致性较低。结论:所提出的深度学习系统在脑膜瘤检测和分割方面表现出与中高级放射科医生相当的先进性能。该系统有可能显著提高脑膜瘤的检测和分割效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信