A bibliometric analysis study on coccydynia treatment

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emir Kaan Izci , Cem Yilmaz
{"title":"A bibliometric analysis study on coccydynia treatment","authors":"Emir Kaan Izci ,&nbsp;Cem Yilmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2023.101871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The objective of this study was to shed light on the topic of coccidynia, a condition of significant importance within the field of neurosurgery, by examining the scientific publications dedicated to its understanding and treatment. By conducting a comprehensive bibliometric analysis, we aimed to explore the extent of research conducted on coccidynia, identify key contributing countries, prolific authors, and prevalent research themes. Our study sought to provide an in-depth understanding of the temporal evolution of coccidynia literature and contribute to the accumulation of knowledge in this specialized area.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>To achieve our objective, we conducted an extensive literature search utilizing the esteemed Web of Science database. Through the advanced search engine within the WOS system, we meticulously curated a comprehensive dataset by focusing on the keyword “coccydynia treatment.” This specific keyword allowed us to identify relevant scientific articles and publications related to the treatment of coccidynia. The dataset was then analyzed to extract crucial information, including the number of articles published over time, the geographic distribution of research, the co-authorship patterns among researchers, and the prevalent keywords associated with coccidynia literature.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our investigation revealed intriguing insights into the landscape of coccidynia research. We discovered that the earliest scientific article on this subject was published in 1991, signifying the relatively recent emergence of scholarly interest in this domain. Notably, the volume of publications experienced a substantial surge after 2010, suggesting a growing recognition of coccidynia's clinical significance. In total, we identified and examined 143 articles published between 1970 and 2023, encompassing several decades of scientific inquiry into the condition. By meticulously analyzing the geographical distribution of research, we found that the United States of America emerged as the leading country in terms of producing publications on “coccydynia treatment.” Within this literature, we also identified key authors who made significant contributions to the field, with notable names including Maigne JY, Finsen V, and Knobloch RG. Moreover, our analysis of citation patterns revealed that articles originating from the United States received a commendable number of citations, with an average of 3.48 citations per article, while publications from Turkey garnered an average of 2.33 citations per article. Furthermore, we identified the most frequently utilized keywords in coccidynia literature, highlighting the emphasis placed on terms such as “idiopathic coccygodynia,” “sitting position,” “coccydynia,” “coccyx,” and “coccygectomy.” By conducting this bibliometric analysis of original scientific studies published since 1970, our study contributes to the existing knowledge base regarding coccidynia and its treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Through our meticulous bibliometric analysis, we have contributed to the existing body of knowledge surrounding coccidynia and its treatment. The comprehensive examination of scientific publications since 1970 has provided valuable insights into the temporal evolution of research on this condition. Our findings highlight the growing interest and recognition of coccidynia as a clinically significant neurosurgical topic. The identification of leading countries, prolific authors, and prevalent research themes serves as a foundation for future investigations and allows researchers to better understand the landscape of coccidynia research. We emphasize the importance of periodic updates and revisions to these studies, ensuring that the scientific community has access to the most current and comprehensive information for rational analysis and decision-making in the field of coccidynia research and treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923001548/pdfft?md5=1c90f07e762eb11ff1609fd493d98873&pid=1-s2.0-S2214751923001548-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923001548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The objective of this study was to shed light on the topic of coccidynia, a condition of significant importance within the field of neurosurgery, by examining the scientific publications dedicated to its understanding and treatment. By conducting a comprehensive bibliometric analysis, we aimed to explore the extent of research conducted on coccidynia, identify key contributing countries, prolific authors, and prevalent research themes. Our study sought to provide an in-depth understanding of the temporal evolution of coccidynia literature and contribute to the accumulation of knowledge in this specialized area.

Material and method

To achieve our objective, we conducted an extensive literature search utilizing the esteemed Web of Science database. Through the advanced search engine within the WOS system, we meticulously curated a comprehensive dataset by focusing on the keyword “coccydynia treatment.” This specific keyword allowed us to identify relevant scientific articles and publications related to the treatment of coccidynia. The dataset was then analyzed to extract crucial information, including the number of articles published over time, the geographic distribution of research, the co-authorship patterns among researchers, and the prevalent keywords associated with coccidynia literature.

Results

Our investigation revealed intriguing insights into the landscape of coccidynia research. We discovered that the earliest scientific article on this subject was published in 1991, signifying the relatively recent emergence of scholarly interest in this domain. Notably, the volume of publications experienced a substantial surge after 2010, suggesting a growing recognition of coccidynia's clinical significance. In total, we identified and examined 143 articles published between 1970 and 2023, encompassing several decades of scientific inquiry into the condition. By meticulously analyzing the geographical distribution of research, we found that the United States of America emerged as the leading country in terms of producing publications on “coccydynia treatment.” Within this literature, we also identified key authors who made significant contributions to the field, with notable names including Maigne JY, Finsen V, and Knobloch RG. Moreover, our analysis of citation patterns revealed that articles originating from the United States received a commendable number of citations, with an average of 3.48 citations per article, while publications from Turkey garnered an average of 2.33 citations per article. Furthermore, we identified the most frequently utilized keywords in coccidynia literature, highlighting the emphasis placed on terms such as “idiopathic coccygodynia,” “sitting position,” “coccydynia,” “coccyx,” and “coccygectomy.” By conducting this bibliometric analysis of original scientific studies published since 1970, our study contributes to the existing knowledge base regarding coccidynia and its treatment.

Conclusion

Through our meticulous bibliometric analysis, we have contributed to the existing body of knowledge surrounding coccidynia and its treatment. The comprehensive examination of scientific publications since 1970 has provided valuable insights into the temporal evolution of research on this condition. Our findings highlight the growing interest and recognition of coccidynia as a clinically significant neurosurgical topic. The identification of leading countries, prolific authors, and prevalent research themes serves as a foundation for future investigations and allows researchers to better understand the landscape of coccidynia research. We emphasize the importance of periodic updates and revisions to these studies, ensuring that the scientific community has access to the most current and comprehensive information for rational analysis and decision-making in the field of coccidynia research and treatment.

尾骨痛治疗的文献计量分析研究
目的本研究的目的是阐明尾蚴病的主题,这是神经外科领域的一个重要条件,通过检查科学出版物致力于其理解和治疗。通过进行全面的文献计量分析,我们旨在探索球虫病研究的范围,确定主要贡献国、多产作者和流行的研究主题。我们的研究旨在深入了解球虫病文献的时间演变,并为这一专业领域的知识积累做出贡献。为了实现我们的目标,我们利用著名的Web of Science数据库进行了广泛的文献检索。通过WOS系统内的高级搜索引擎,我们以“尾骨痛治疗”为关键词,精心策划了一个全面的数据集。这个特定的关键词使我们能够识别有关球虫病治疗的相关科学文章和出版物。然后对数据集进行分析以提取关键信息,包括随时间推移发表的文章数量、研究的地理分布、研究人员之间的共同作者模式以及与球虫病文献相关的流行关键词。结果我们的调查揭示了对球虫病研究前景的有趣见解。我们发现,关于这一主题的最早的科学文章发表于1991年,这表明这一领域的学术兴趣相对较晚出现。值得注意的是,2010年之后的出版物数量大幅增加,表明人们越来越认识到球虫病的临床意义。我们总共确定并检查了1970年至2023年间发表的143篇文章,其中包括数十年来对这种情况的科学研究。通过仔细分析研究的地理分布,我们发现美国在发表关于“尾骨痛治疗”的出版物方面处于领先地位。在这些文献中,我们还确定了对该领域做出重大贡献的关键作者,其中包括Maigne JY, Finsen V和Knobloch RG。此外,我们对引用模式的分析显示,来自美国的文章获得了值得称赞的引用次数,平均每篇文章被引用3.48次,而来自土耳其的出版物平均每篇文章被引用2.33次。此外,我们确定了尾骨痛文献中最常用的关键词,强调了诸如“特发性尾骨痛”、“坐姿”、“尾骨痛”、“尾骨”和“尾骨切除术”等术语的重点。通过对1970年以来发表的原始科学研究进行文献计量学分析,我们的研究有助于建立关于球虫病及其治疗的现有知识库。结论通过细致的文献计量学分析,我们对球虫病及其治疗的现有知识体系做出了贡献。对自1970年以来的科学出版物的全面审查为研究这种情况的时间演变提供了有价值的见解。我们的研究结果突出了对球虫病作为临床重要神经外科课题的日益增长的兴趣和认识。主要国家、多产作者和流行研究主题的确定为未来的调查奠定了基础,并使研究人员能够更好地了解球虫病研究的现状。我们强调定期更新和修订这些研究的重要性,确保科学界能够获得最新和全面的信息,以便在球虫病研究和治疗领域进行理性分析和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信