Streamlining extracellular polymeric substance removal: Fuzzy multi-objective optimization of ultrasonic-Fenton treatment

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Angelo Earvin Sy Choi, Danielle Grace Evangelista, Joseph R. Ortenero
{"title":"Streamlining extracellular polymeric substance removal: Fuzzy multi-objective optimization of ultrasonic-Fenton treatment","authors":"Angelo Earvin Sy Choi,&nbsp;Danielle Grace Evangelista,&nbsp;Joseph R. Ortenero","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Managing high water content sludge in wastewater treatment is crucial for sustainability. This involves a complex challenge of maximizing the removal of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (LB-EPS) while minimizing ultrasonic-Fenton process costs. This study introduces a novel approach to address these conflicting objectives by adopting fuzzy multi-objective optimization. This method reconciles the conflicting objectives by identifying the optimal conditions for ferrous ion (Fe<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math></span>) dosage, hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) dosage, and ultrasonication time. The optimization model incorporates empirical equations that define the effects of Fenton’s reagent and ultrasonication on LB-EPS removal, as well as considerations for material and electricity usage costs and the cumulative uncertainties associated with experimental runs. To effectively capture the trade-offs between EPS removal and process costs, the <span><math><mi>ɛ</mi></math></span> -constraint method was utilized to delineate the Pareto front. This approach significantly enhances LB-EPS removal from anaerobically digested sludge and establishes boundary limits within the Pareto front for practical application within the context of fuzzy optimization. The optimized solution derived from this innovative approach resulted in the conditions of 10 mM Fe<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math></span> dosage, 100 mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> dosage, and 10 min of ultrasonication. This configuration achieves an impressive 60.7% <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 3.7% LB-EPS removal while maintaining a cost of 26.6 USD/L and ensuring 100% overall satisfaction. This research represents a significant advancement in sludge dewatering strategies. It underscores the pivotal role of innovative decision-making approaches in advancing the field of sludge dewatering methodologies for more sustainable wastewater treatment practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000348/pdfft?md5=36b68b6a2e5322e1966009e74aec8e23&pid=1-s2.0-S2666916123000348-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing high water content sludge in wastewater treatment is crucial for sustainability. This involves a complex challenge of maximizing the removal of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (LB-EPS) while minimizing ultrasonic-Fenton process costs. This study introduces a novel approach to address these conflicting objectives by adopting fuzzy multi-objective optimization. This method reconciles the conflicting objectives by identifying the optimal conditions for ferrous ion (Fe2+) dosage, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) dosage, and ultrasonication time. The optimization model incorporates empirical equations that define the effects of Fenton’s reagent and ultrasonication on LB-EPS removal, as well as considerations for material and electricity usage costs and the cumulative uncertainties associated with experimental runs. To effectively capture the trade-offs between EPS removal and process costs, the ɛ -constraint method was utilized to delineate the Pareto front. This approach significantly enhances LB-EPS removal from anaerobically digested sludge and establishes boundary limits within the Pareto front for practical application within the context of fuzzy optimization. The optimized solution derived from this innovative approach resulted in the conditions of 10 mM Fe2+ dosage, 100 mM H2O2 dosage, and 10 min of ultrasonication. This configuration achieves an impressive 60.7% ± 3.7% LB-EPS removal while maintaining a cost of 26.6 USD/L and ensuring 100% overall satisfaction. This research represents a significant advancement in sludge dewatering strategies. It underscores the pivotal role of innovative decision-making approaches in advancing the field of sludge dewatering methodologies for more sustainable wastewater treatment practices.

Abstract Image

流线型细胞外聚合物去除:超声- fenton处理的模糊多目标优化
在废水处理中管理高含水量污泥对可持续性至关重要。这涉及到最大限度地去除松散结合的细胞外聚合物(LB-EPS),同时最大限度地降低超声波-芬顿工艺成本的复杂挑战。本文提出了一种新的方法,即采用模糊多目标优化来解决这些冲突的目标。该方法通过确定亚铁离子(Fe2+)用量、过氧化氢(H2O2)用量和超声处理时间的最佳条件来协调矛盾的目标。优化模型结合了经验方程,定义了Fenton试剂和超声波对LB-EPS去除的影响,并考虑了材料和电力使用成本以及与实验运行相关的累积不确定性。为了有效地捕捉EPS去除和工艺成本之间的权衡,使用了约束方法来描绘帕累托前沿。该方法显著提高了厌氧消化污泥中LB-EPS的去除,并在模糊优化的背景下建立了帕累托前沿的边界限制。优化后的溶液条件为:Fe2+投加量为10 mM, H2O2投加量为100 mM,超声作用时间为10 min。这种配置实现了令人印象深刻的60.7%±3.7% LB-EPS去除,同时保持了26.6美元/升的成本,并确保了100%的总体满意度。这项研究代表了污泥脱水策略的重大进展。它强调了创新决策方法在推进污泥脱水方法领域的关键作用,以实现更可持续的废水处理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信