Interpreting coagulation mixing study results in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001267
Moon Joo Kim, Eric Salazar, Bonnie Philips, Lawrence Rice, Brian Castillo, Christopher Leveque, Jian Chen
{"title":"Interpreting coagulation mixing study results in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.","authors":"Moon Joo Kim, Eric Salazar, Bonnie Philips, Lawrence Rice, Brian Castillo, Christopher Leveque, Jian Chen","doi":"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interpretation of coagulation mixing studies is complicated by interference arising from direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which are increasingly prescribed. In this retrospective study, we reviewed 1035 consecutive coagulation mixing studies performed from 2017 to 2021. Three hundred and ninety-nine cases with normal prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were excluded. aPTT mixing studies were performed at time 0 and after 60 min of incubation. We confirmed the presence of interfering factors with additional laboratory testing, medication records, and medical history. Mixing corrected most prolonged PT samples (93%), but 32 cases showed incomplete correction. Of these 32 cases, 18 were confounded by DOAC use, and 3 by factor V (FV) inhibitor. We observed an unusual pattern of prolongation of aPTT after incubation, which was previously considered a characteristic of specific factor inhibitors, most commonly FVIII inhibitor. However, we found that lupus anticoagulant (28%) and DOAC (25%) contributed to this pattern similarly as specific factor inhibitors (28%). Coagulation laboratories should be aware of interference arising from DOACs and other factors in PT/aPTT mixing studies, especially in some unusual correction patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":8992,"journal":{"name":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpretation of coagulation mixing studies is complicated by interference arising from direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which are increasingly prescribed. In this retrospective study, we reviewed 1035 consecutive coagulation mixing studies performed from 2017 to 2021. Three hundred and ninety-nine cases with normal prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were excluded. aPTT mixing studies were performed at time 0 and after 60 min of incubation. We confirmed the presence of interfering factors with additional laboratory testing, medication records, and medical history. Mixing corrected most prolonged PT samples (93%), but 32 cases showed incomplete correction. Of these 32 cases, 18 were confounded by DOAC use, and 3 by factor V (FV) inhibitor. We observed an unusual pattern of prolongation of aPTT after incubation, which was previously considered a characteristic of specific factor inhibitors, most commonly FVIII inhibitor. However, we found that lupus anticoagulant (28%) and DOAC (25%) contributed to this pattern similarly as specific factor inhibitors (28%). Coagulation laboratories should be aware of interference arising from DOACs and other factors in PT/aPTT mixing studies, especially in some unusual correction patterns.

解释直接口服抗凝剂时代的混凝研究结果。
由于直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的干扰,对凝血混合研究的解释变得复杂。在这项回顾性研究中,我们回顾了2017年至2021年进行的1035项连续凝血混合研究。排除凝血酶原时间(PT)和部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)正常的399例。aPTT混合研究分别在0和60分钟孵育后进行。我们通过额外的实验室检测、用药记录和病史确认了干扰因素的存在。混合校正了大部分延长的PT样本(93%),但32例显示不完全校正。在这32例中,18例与DOAC混淆,3例与因子V (FV)抑制剂混淆。我们观察到孵育后aPTT延长的不寻常模式,这以前被认为是特定因子抑制剂的特征,最常见的是FVIII抑制剂。然而,我们发现狼疮抗凝剂(28%)和DOAC(25%)与特定因子抑制剂(28%)相似。凝血实验室应该意识到在PT/aPTT混合研究中doac和其他因素引起的干扰,特别是在一些不寻常的校正模式中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis is an international fully refereed journal that features review and original research articles on all clinical, laboratory and experimental aspects of haemostasis and thrombosis. The journal is devoted to publishing significant developments worldwide in the field of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, platelets and the kininogen-kinin system, as well as dealing with those aspects of blood rheology relevant to haemostasis and the effects of drugs on haemostatic components
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信