Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector

IF 5 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Danny MacKinnon , Stuart Dawley , Markus Steen , Max-Peter Menzel , Asbjørn Karlsen , Pascal Sommer , Gard Hopsdal Hansen , Håkon Endresen Normann
{"title":"Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector","authors":"Danny MacKinnon ,&nbsp;Stuart Dawley ,&nbsp;Markus Steen ,&nbsp;Max-Peter Menzel ,&nbsp;Asbjørn Karlsen ,&nbsp;Pascal Sommer ,&nbsp;Gard Hopsdal Hansen ,&nbsp;Håkon Endresen Normann","doi":"10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The question of how regions and nations develop new sources of industrial growth is of recurring interest in economic geography<span> and planning studies. From an evolutionary economic geography (EEG) perspective, new growth paths emerge out of existing economic activities and their associated assets and conditions. In response to the micro-economic and endogenous focus of much EEG research, this paper utilises a broader evolutionary perspective on path creation which stresses the dynamic interplay between four sets of factors: regional assets; key economic and organisational actors; mechanisms of path creation; and multi-scalar institutional environments and policy initiatives. Reflecting the importance of extra-regional networks and institutions, this framework is also informed by the Global Production Networks (GPN) approach, which highlights the process of strategic coupling between firms and regions and its political and institutional mediation by state institutions at different spatial scales. We deploy this framework to investigate regional path creation in the context of renewable energy technologies, focusing specifically on the offshore wind industry. We adopt a comparative cross-national approach, examining the evolution of offshore wind in Germany, the UK and Norway. Of the three cases, Germany has developed the most deep-rooted and holistic path to date, characterised by leading roles in both deployment and manufacturing. By contrast, path creation in the UK and Norway has evolved in more partial and selective ways. The UK’s growth path is developing in a relatively shallow manner, based largely upon deployment and ‘outside in’ investment, whilst Norway’s path is emerging in an exogenous, ‘inside-out’ fashion around a fairly confined set of actors and deployment and supply functions. In conclusion, the paper emphasises the important role of national states in orchestrating the strategic coupling of regional and national assets to particular mechanisms of path creation.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47399,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Planning","volume":"130 ","pages":"Pages 1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Planning","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030590061730140X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

The question of how regions and nations develop new sources of industrial growth is of recurring interest in economic geography and planning studies. From an evolutionary economic geography (EEG) perspective, new growth paths emerge out of existing economic activities and their associated assets and conditions. In response to the micro-economic and endogenous focus of much EEG research, this paper utilises a broader evolutionary perspective on path creation which stresses the dynamic interplay between four sets of factors: regional assets; key economic and organisational actors; mechanisms of path creation; and multi-scalar institutional environments and policy initiatives. Reflecting the importance of extra-regional networks and institutions, this framework is also informed by the Global Production Networks (GPN) approach, which highlights the process of strategic coupling between firms and regions and its political and institutional mediation by state institutions at different spatial scales. We deploy this framework to investigate regional path creation in the context of renewable energy technologies, focusing specifically on the offshore wind industry. We adopt a comparative cross-national approach, examining the evolution of offshore wind in Germany, the UK and Norway. Of the three cases, Germany has developed the most deep-rooted and holistic path to date, characterised by leading roles in both deployment and manufacturing. By contrast, path creation in the UK and Norway has evolved in more partial and selective ways. The UK’s growth path is developing in a relatively shallow manner, based largely upon deployment and ‘outside in’ investment, whilst Norway’s path is emerging in an exogenous, ‘inside-out’ fashion around a fairly confined set of actors and deployment and supply functions. In conclusion, the paper emphasises the important role of national states in orchestrating the strategic coupling of regional and national assets to particular mechanisms of path creation.

路径创建,全球生产网络和区域发展:海上风电部门的国际比较分析
地区和国家如何开发新的工业增长来源的问题是经济地理学和规划研究中反复出现的兴趣。从演化经济地理学的角度来看,新的增长路径是从现有的经济活动及其相关的资产和条件中产生的。针对许多脑电图研究的微观经济和内生焦点,本文采用更广泛的进化视角来研究路径创造,强调四组因素之间的动态相互作用:区域资产;主要的经济和组织参与者;路径创造机制;多尺度的制度环境和政策举措。全球生产网络(GPN)方法也反映了区域外网络和制度的重要性,该框架强调了企业和地区之间的战略耦合过程,以及国家机构在不同空间尺度上的政治和制度调解。我们利用这一框架来研究可再生能源技术背景下的区域路径创建,特别关注海上风电行业。我们采用比较的跨国方法,研究了德国、英国和挪威海上风电的发展。在这三个案例中,德国迄今为止发展出了最根深蒂固、最全面的道路,其特点是在部署和制造方面都处于领先地位。相比之下,英国和挪威的路径创造则以更局部和选择性的方式发展。英国的增长路径以一种相对肤浅的方式发展,主要基于部署和“由外而内”的投资,而挪威的增长路径则以一种外生的、“由内而外”的方式出现,围绕着一组相当有限的参与者、部署和供应功能。最后,本文强调了民族国家在协调区域和国家资产与特定路径创造机制的战略耦合方面的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.60%
发文量
26
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Planning is a multidisciplinary journal of research monographs offering a convenient and rapid outlet for extended papers in the field of spatial and environmental planning. Each issue comprises a single monograph of between 25,000 and 35,000 words. The journal is fully peer reviewed, has a global readership, and has been in publication since 1972.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信