Safety and efficacy of three oral rehydration solutions for children with diarrhoea (Edinburgh 1984-85).

W A Cutting, N R Belton, J A Gray, R P Brettle, P D Welsby, W T Todd, R A Elton, A Westwood, S Davidson
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of three oral rehydration solutions for children with diarrhoea (Edinburgh 1984-85).","authors":"W A Cutting,&nbsp;N R Belton,&nbsp;J A Gray,&nbsp;R P Brettle,&nbsp;P D Welsby,&nbsp;W T Todd,&nbsp;R A Elton,&nbsp;A Westwood,&nbsp;S Davidson","doi":"10.1111/j.1651-2227.1989.tb11065.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Of 357 children with acute diarrhoea admitted to the City Hospital, Edinburgh, over a 12-month period, only 5 (1.4%) required IV infusions. Three hundred and nineteen were treated with oral rehydration (OR). Of these 269 were studied in detail and 43% had signs of dehydration, but in none of them was it severe. There were no fatalities. Patients were randomly allocated to treatment with one of three OR solutions in a double blind trial. The solutions had sodium concentrations of 35, 50 and 90 mmol (mEq)/l, and dextrose of 200 (36 g/l), 111 (20 g/l) and 110 (19.8 g/l) mmol/l, respectively. Hypernatraemia was not a clinical problem and only 5 children (2%) were biochemically hypernatraemic on admission. Treatment did not cause clinical hypernatraemia. At the second assessment only 3 children were biochemically hypernatraemic, one from each treatment group, and no one had clinical signs. All three solutions were safe and effective in the relatively mildly dehydrated patients currently seen in the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":75407,"journal":{"name":"Acta paediatrica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1989.tb11065.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta paediatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1989.tb11065.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Of 357 children with acute diarrhoea admitted to the City Hospital, Edinburgh, over a 12-month period, only 5 (1.4%) required IV infusions. Three hundred and nineteen were treated with oral rehydration (OR). Of these 269 were studied in detail and 43% had signs of dehydration, but in none of them was it severe. There were no fatalities. Patients were randomly allocated to treatment with one of three OR solutions in a double blind trial. The solutions had sodium concentrations of 35, 50 and 90 mmol (mEq)/l, and dextrose of 200 (36 g/l), 111 (20 g/l) and 110 (19.8 g/l) mmol/l, respectively. Hypernatraemia was not a clinical problem and only 5 children (2%) were biochemically hypernatraemic on admission. Treatment did not cause clinical hypernatraemia. At the second assessment only 3 children were biochemically hypernatraemic, one from each treatment group, and no one had clinical signs. All three solutions were safe and effective in the relatively mildly dehydrated patients currently seen in the UK.

三种口服补液治疗腹泻儿童的安全性和有效性(爱丁堡1984-85)。
爱丁堡城市医院在12个月期间收治的357名急性腹泻儿童中,只有5名(1.4%)需要静脉输液。其中319例采用口服补液治疗。对这269人进行了详细的研究,其中43%的人有脱水的迹象,但都不严重。没有人员死亡。在双盲试验中,患者被随机分配到三种OR溶液中的一种治疗。溶液中钠浓度分别为35、50和90 mmol (mEq)/l,葡萄糖浓度分别为200 (36 g/l)、111 (20 g/l)和110 (19.8 g/l) mmol/l。高钠血症不是一个临床问题,只有5名儿童(2%)在入院时出现生化高钠血症。治疗未引起临床高钠血症。在第二次评估时,只有3名儿童出现生化性高钠血症,每个治疗组各1名,没有任何临床症状。这三种溶液对目前在英国出现的相对轻度脱水患者都是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信