[Predictive value of tactile sense in electronic endodontometry].

E Vachey, J Rougé, J Duguet, G Lemagnen, J C Roques, J Duhamel
{"title":"[Predictive value of tactile sense in electronic endodontometry].","authors":"E Vachey,&nbsp;J Rougé,&nbsp;J Duguet,&nbsp;G Lemagnen,&nbsp;J C Roques,&nbsp;J Duhamel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A statistical study has been conducted in order to study the benefit afforded by tactile sense in endodontometry. The study is based on 154 electronic measures (Dentometer, Endoradar, MEO2) and 90 tactiles ones, all radiographically controlled. Results show that: 1. The rate of good electronic measures is, as a whole, the same as tactile ones. 2. The risk of wrong measures is twofold in the case of narrow root canal, necrosis or molar treatment. 3. The risk lessens in the case of a pulpectomy when the electronic measure is associated with a tactile one: 48.38% success instead of 25%, in tactile sense: 48.8 success instead of 56.25%. Evidently, the study bring up to date the tactile perception in endodontometry in the case of pulpectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":77616,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise d'endodontie : publication officielle de la Societe francaise d'endodontie","volume":"8 2","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise d'endodontie : publication officielle de la Societe francaise d'endodontie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A statistical study has been conducted in order to study the benefit afforded by tactile sense in endodontometry. The study is based on 154 electronic measures (Dentometer, Endoradar, MEO2) and 90 tactiles ones, all radiographically controlled. Results show that: 1. The rate of good electronic measures is, as a whole, the same as tactile ones. 2. The risk of wrong measures is twofold in the case of narrow root canal, necrosis or molar treatment. 3. The risk lessens in the case of a pulpectomy when the electronic measure is associated with a tactile one: 48.38% success instead of 25%, in tactile sense: 48.8 success instead of 56.25%. Evidently, the study bring up to date the tactile perception in endodontometry in the case of pulpectomy.

触觉在电子牙髓检查中的预测价值。
为了研究触觉在牙髓测量中的益处,进行了一项统计研究。这项研究是基于154个电子测量(Dentometer, Endoradar, MEO2)和90个触觉测量,所有这些都是放射控制的。结果表明:1。总的来说,电子测量的准确度和触觉测量的准确度是一样的。2. 在根管狭窄、坏死或磨牙治疗的情况下,错误措施的风险是双重的。3.当电子测量与触觉测量相结合时,髓质切除术的风险降低:48.38%的成功率而不是25%,触觉成功率为48.8%而不是56.25%。显然,这项研究提出了最新的触觉知觉在牙髓切除术的情况下牙髓切开术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信