A study of event-related potential P300 in cerebral infarction.

X F Tang, Y N Huang, L Y Cui, H Du, B H Li, L N Zhang
{"title":"A study of event-related potential P300 in cerebral infarction.","authors":"X F Tang,&nbsp;Y N Huang,&nbsp;L Y Cui,&nbsp;H Du,&nbsp;B H Li,&nbsp;L N Zhang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>N1, P2 and P300 potentials were studied in 20 cases of cerebral infarction and 47 healthy controls with the standard technique of auditory event-related potentials. Healthy controls of both sexes, different ages, education levels and cognitive capacity did not show apparent differences in the latency of P300 (P greater than 0.05, respectively). The patient group, however, revealed a significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of latency of P300 (means = 409.6 +/- 50 ms) as compared with 28 well matched healthy subjects (means = 337.7 +/- 24 ms). Although there was a slightly lower amplitude of P300 in the patient group, the difference between control and patient groups was not significant (P greater than 0.05). There was a significant difference in the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination findings between control and patient groups (P less than 0.01), but it seems that evaluation of the cognition-related latency of P300 may be more objective and sensitive in distinguishing between organic and cognitive distress (P less than 0.001).</p>","PeriodicalId":77596,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and the Peking Union Medical College = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh yuan, Chung-kuo hsieh ho i k'o ta hsueh hsueh pao","volume":"4 4","pages":"205-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and the Peking Union Medical College = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh yuan, Chung-kuo hsieh ho i k'o ta hsueh hsueh pao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

N1, P2 and P300 potentials were studied in 20 cases of cerebral infarction and 47 healthy controls with the standard technique of auditory event-related potentials. Healthy controls of both sexes, different ages, education levels and cognitive capacity did not show apparent differences in the latency of P300 (P greater than 0.05, respectively). The patient group, however, revealed a significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of latency of P300 (means = 409.6 +/- 50 ms) as compared with 28 well matched healthy subjects (means = 337.7 +/- 24 ms). Although there was a slightly lower amplitude of P300 in the patient group, the difference between control and patient groups was not significant (P greater than 0.05). There was a significant difference in the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination findings between control and patient groups (P less than 0.01), but it seems that evaluation of the cognition-related latency of P300 may be more objective and sensitive in distinguishing between organic and cognitive distress (P less than 0.001).

脑梗死事件相关电位P300的研究。
应用标准听觉事件相关电位技术对20例脑梗死患者和47例正常人的N1、P2和P300电位进行了研究。不同性别、不同年龄、不同文化程度、不同认知能力的健康对照组P300潜伏期差异无统计学意义(P均大于0.05)。然而,与28名匹配良好的健康受试者(平均= 337.7 +/- 24 ms)相比,患者组的P300潜伏期明显延长(P < 0.001)(平均= 409.6 +/- 50 ms)。患者组P300振幅虽略低,但与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。认知能力筛查检查结果在对照组和患者组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.01),但P300认知相关潜伏期的评估可能在区分有机和认知困扰方面更为客观和敏感(P < 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信