Ineffective slack

Ernst Jonsson
{"title":"Ineffective slack","authors":"Ernst Jonsson","doi":"10.1016/0281-7527(86)90023-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In what is known as the contribution-inducement model the organization is regarded as a coalition between various participants. If certain participants receive larger inducements that are necessary to hold the coalition together, what is called organizational slack will arise. Superfluous employees also constitute slack.</p><p>The existence of slack enables the organization to survive during bad times. Slack is also said to reduce conflicts and to play a stabilising role in the organization.</p><p>This theory is questioned in what follows — the starting point being a definition of the concept of slack. From the same initial assumptions as the slack theory, the article culminates in diametrically opposite conclusions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101144,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(86)90023-X","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/028175278690023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In what is known as the contribution-inducement model the organization is regarded as a coalition between various participants. If certain participants receive larger inducements that are necessary to hold the coalition together, what is called organizational slack will arise. Superfluous employees also constitute slack.

The existence of slack enables the organization to survive during bad times. Slack is also said to reduce conflicts and to play a stabilising role in the organization.

This theory is questioned in what follows — the starting point being a definition of the concept of slack. From the same initial assumptions as the slack theory, the article culminates in diametrically opposite conclusions.

无效的松弛
在所谓的贡献-诱导模型中,组织被视为各个参与者之间的联盟。如果某些参与者获得了维系联盟所必需的更大的激励,就会出现所谓的组织松弛。多余的员工也构成了懈怠。懈怠的存在使组织能够在困难时期生存下来。据说,懈怠还能减少冲突,并在组织中发挥稳定作用。这一理论在接下来的内容中受到质疑——起点是对懈怠概念的定义。从与松弛理论相同的初始假设出发,本文最终得出了截然相反的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信