Guías de Práctica Clínica Basadas en Evidencia, cerrando la brecha entre el conocimiento científico y la toma de decisiones clínicas. Documento de la serie MBE, 3 de 3

IF 0.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
José Luis Mayorga Butrón , Liliana Velasco Hidalgo , Francisco Javier Ochoa-Carrillo
{"title":"Guías de Práctica Clínica Basadas en Evidencia, cerrando la brecha entre el conocimiento científico y la toma de decisiones clínicas. Documento de la serie MBE, 3 de 3","authors":"José Luis Mayorga Butrón ,&nbsp;Liliana Velasco Hidalgo ,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Ochoa-Carrillo","doi":"10.1016/j.gamo.2015.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendations to assist practitioners, patients and other health professionals in their clinical decisions in order to achieve better healthcare.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Narrative review. The purpose of this work is to describe the CPGs fundamentals and the steps to develop them.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CPGs contain recommendations result of a systematic work of a development group integrated by clinical and methodological experts, stakeholder and patients representatives. The protocol includes the scope, a list of clinical structured questions and systematic reviews to find, assess and extract evidence. An expert consensus panel methodology is also considered in order to integrated expertise to the existent scientific evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CPGs aim is to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and clinical decision-making through clinical recommendations systematically developed. This is the third document of a series of literature review that has been written to aware about the value of CPGs and the importance that clinical oncologists and researchers adopt and develop such documents in our country and worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41581,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia","volume":"14 6","pages":"Pages 329-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gamo.2015.12.005","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665920115001182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendations to assist practitioners, patients and other health professionals in their clinical decisions in order to achieve better healthcare.

Material and methods

Narrative review. The purpose of this work is to describe the CPGs fundamentals and the steps to develop them.

Results

CPGs contain recommendations result of a systematic work of a development group integrated by clinical and methodological experts, stakeholder and patients representatives. The protocol includes the scope, a list of clinical structured questions and systematic reviews to find, assess and extract evidence. An expert consensus panel methodology is also considered in order to integrated expertise to the existent scientific evidence.

Conclusion

CPGs aim is to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and clinical decision-making through clinical recommendations systematically developed. This is the third document of a series of literature review that has been written to aware about the value of CPGs and the importance that clinical oncologists and researchers adopt and develop such documents in our country and worldwide.

循证临床实践指南,弥合科学知识和临床决策之间的差距。MBE系列文档,3中的3
基于证据的临床实践指南(cpg)包含建议,以帮助医生、患者和其他卫生专业人员在他们的临床决策,以实现更好的医疗保健。材料和方法:叙述性综述。本工作的目的是描述CPGs的基本原理和开发步骤。结果scpg包含由临床和方法学专家、利益相关者和患者代表组成的开发小组系统工作的建议结果。该方案包括范围、临床结构化问题清单和系统综述,以发现、评估和提取证据。还考虑了专家共识小组方法,以便将专业知识与现有科学证据相结合。结论cpgs的目的是通过系统地制定临床建议,弥合科学证据与临床决策之间的差距。本文是一系列文献综述的第三篇,旨在了解CPGs的价值,以及临床肿瘤学家和研究人员在我国和世界范围内采用和开发此类文献的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
255
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信