Supportive Services at End of Life can Help Reduce Acute Care Services: Observations From the Medicare Care Choices Model.

Patricia Rowan, Danielle Whicher, Marlena Luhr, Lynn Miescier, Keith Kranker, Boyd Gilman
{"title":"Supportive Services at End of Life can Help Reduce Acute Care Services: Observations From the Medicare Care Choices Model.","authors":"Patricia Rowan, Danielle Whicher, Marlena Luhr, Lynn Miescier, Keith Kranker, Boyd Gilman","doi":"10.1177/10499091231216887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study identifies the mechanisms through which supportive and palliative care services at the end-of-life helped prevent unnecessary use of acute care services.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>From 2016 to 2021, the Medicare Care Choices Model (MCCM) tested whether offering Medicare beneficiaries the option to receive supportive and palliative care services through hospice providers, concurrently with treatments for their terminal conditions, improved patients' quality of life and care and reduced Medicare expenditures. Previous MCCM evaluation results showed that the model achieved its goals, but did not examine in depth the causal mechanisms leading to these results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods evaluation based on descriptive analysis of MCCM encounter data and qualitative analysis of interviews with staff from high-performing MCCM hospices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MCCM hospices provided 217 156 encounters to 7263 enrollees over 6 years. Enrollees received on average 30 encounters with hospice staff while enrolled in the model, representing about 10 encounters per month enrolled. Most encounters were delivered by clinically trained staff in the patient's home. Hospice staff identified five services critical for keeping patients from seeking acute care services: early and frequent needs assessments, direct observation of patients in their homes, immediate responses to patients' medical complaints, round-the-clock telephone access to nursing staff, and communication and coordination of care with primary care physicians and specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative care approaches that are high-touch, employ clinically trained staff who visit patients in their homes, routinely evaluate how to manage patient symptoms, and are available when needs arise can improve outcomes and decrease costs at the end of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"1037-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231216887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study identifies the mechanisms through which supportive and palliative care services at the end-of-life helped prevent unnecessary use of acute care services.

Background: From 2016 to 2021, the Medicare Care Choices Model (MCCM) tested whether offering Medicare beneficiaries the option to receive supportive and palliative care services through hospice providers, concurrently with treatments for their terminal conditions, improved patients' quality of life and care and reduced Medicare expenditures. Previous MCCM evaluation results showed that the model achieved its goals, but did not examine in depth the causal mechanisms leading to these results.

Methods: Mixed-methods evaluation based on descriptive analysis of MCCM encounter data and qualitative analysis of interviews with staff from high-performing MCCM hospices.

Results: MCCM hospices provided 217 156 encounters to 7263 enrollees over 6 years. Enrollees received on average 30 encounters with hospice staff while enrolled in the model, representing about 10 encounters per month enrolled. Most encounters were delivered by clinically trained staff in the patient's home. Hospice staff identified five services critical for keeping patients from seeking acute care services: early and frequent needs assessments, direct observation of patients in their homes, immediate responses to patients' medical complaints, round-the-clock telephone access to nursing staff, and communication and coordination of care with primary care physicians and specialists.

Conclusions: Palliative care approaches that are high-touch, employ clinically trained staff who visit patients in their homes, routinely evaluate how to manage patient symptoms, and are available when needs arise can improve outcomes and decrease costs at the end of life.

生命末期的支持性服务可以帮助减少急症护理服务:来自医疗保险护理选择模型的观察。
目的:本研究确定的机制,通过支持和姑息治疗服务在生命末期帮助防止不必要的使用急性护理服务。背景:从2016年到2021年,医疗保险护理选择模型(MCCM)测试了向医疗保险受益人提供通过临终关怀提供者接受支持性和姑息治疗服务的选择,以及对其临终疾病的治疗,是否改善了患者的生活质量和护理,并减少了医疗保险支出。以往的MCCM评价结果表明,该模型达到了其目标,但没有深入研究导致这些结果的因果机制。方法:基于MCCM遭遇数据的描述性分析和对高绩效MCCM临终关怀医院工作人员访谈的定性分析,采用混合方法进行评价。结果:MCCM临终关怀院在6年内为7263名参保者提供了217 156次就诊。参保者在参与该模式时,平均有30次与安宁疗护人员会面,相当于每月约10次。大多数接触是由在患者家中受过临床培训的工作人员提供的。临终关怀工作人员确定了五项至关重要的服务,使患者不寻求紧急护理服务:早期和频繁的需求评估、在家中对患者的直接观察、对患者医疗投诉的即时反应、与护理人员的全天候电话联系,以及与初级保健医生和专家的护理沟通和协调。结论:高接触性的姑息治疗方法,雇用经过临床培训的工作人员到患者家中拜访,定期评估如何管理患者症状,并在需要时提供,可以改善结果并降低生命末期的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信