Adaptation of the Russian version of Oxford Knee Score

Alexandr S. Demin, Andrey P. Sereda, Dmitrii G. Parfeev, Alexandr I. Avdeev, Alisagib A. Dzhavadov, Eduard D. Sulimov
{"title":"Adaptation of the Russian version of Oxford Knee Score","authors":"Alexandr S. Demin, Andrey P. Sereda, Dmitrii G. Parfeev, Alexandr I. Avdeev, Alisagib A. Dzhavadov, Eduard D. Sulimov","doi":"10.15275/ssmj1902153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to adapt the Russian version of the 1998 Oxford Knee Score (OKS) to assess the level of pain and function of the knee joint in patients both before and after primary knee arthroplasty. Material and methods. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Russian version of OKS has been completed. A patient survey was conducted, and according to its results, the filling rates of both Russian-language versions of OKS were assessed, based on the criteria developed in the course of the current study. The following parameters were also evaluated in our study: validity, internal fit (Cronbach's a), reproducibility, ceiling/floor effect, filling rate, mean score, mean age of patients. Results. The study involved 200 patients hospitalized for primary knee arthroplasty. 167 of them (83%) were women, mean age 64.4 (SD 8.2) and 33 (17%) men, mean age 64 (SD 9.7). Validity index — 0.73, p<0.001, Cronbach's a — 0.864, reproducibility — 0.93 (0.76-0.98), ceiling effect in questions 1, 2, 3, 4; gender effect in questions 5, 7, 10, 11. Conclusion. The new Russian version of OKS, in comparison with the previous version, showed an improvement in the examined criteria for the comparison of the occupancy rates by 6, 9, 11 and 16%, respectively (p<0.05 for each of the criteria).","PeriodicalId":30092,"journal":{"name":"Saratovskii nauchnomeditsinskii zhurnal","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saratovskii nauchnomeditsinskii zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15275/ssmj1902153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to adapt the Russian version of the 1998 Oxford Knee Score (OKS) to assess the level of pain and function of the knee joint in patients both before and after primary knee arthroplasty. Material and methods. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Russian version of OKS has been completed. A patient survey was conducted, and according to its results, the filling rates of both Russian-language versions of OKS were assessed, based on the criteria developed in the course of the current study. The following parameters were also evaluated in our study: validity, internal fit (Cronbach's a), reproducibility, ceiling/floor effect, filling rate, mean score, mean age of patients. Results. The study involved 200 patients hospitalized for primary knee arthroplasty. 167 of them (83%) were women, mean age 64.4 (SD 8.2) and 33 (17%) men, mean age 64 (SD 9.7). Validity index — 0.73, p<0.001, Cronbach's a — 0.864, reproducibility — 0.93 (0.76-0.98), ceiling effect in questions 1, 2, 3, 4; gender effect in questions 5, 7, 10, 11. Conclusion. The new Russian version of OKS, in comparison with the previous version, showed an improvement in the examined criteria for the comparison of the occupancy rates by 6, 9, 11 and 16%, respectively (p<0.05 for each of the criteria).
改编自俄罗斯版《牛津膝谱》
目的:采用1998年俄罗斯版牛津膝关节评分(OKS)来评估原发性膝关节置换术前后患者的疼痛水平和膝关节功能。材料和方法。完成了OKS俄语版本的验证和跨文化改编。对患者进行了调查,并根据调查结果,根据本研究过程中制定的标准,评估了两种俄语版本OKS的填写率。我们的研究还评估了以下参数:效度、内部拟合(Cronbach’s a)、可重复性、上限/下限效应、填充率、平均评分、患者平均年龄。结果。这项研究涉及200名住院接受初级膝关节置换术的患者。其中女性167例(83%),平均年龄64.4岁(SD 8.2);男性33例(17%),平均年龄64岁(SD 9.7)。效度指数- 0.73,p< 0.001, Cronbach's a - 0.864,可重复性- 0.93(0.76-0.98),问题1、2、3、4的天花板效应;问题5、7、10、11中的性别影响。结论。与以前的版本相比,新的俄文版本的OKS显示,用于比较入住率的审查标准分别提高了6%、9%、11%和16%(每个标准的损失率分别为0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信