If we are to fix the education crisis the dominant ideological approach must be changed

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Stuart Cartland
{"title":"If we are to fix the education crisis the dominant ideological approach must be changed","authors":"Stuart Cartland","doi":"10.3898/soun.84-85.10.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dominant discourse around education in the UK has to be challenged. We need to rethink the aims of education, so that it is seen as a public good for society and a democratic right for students: equal access to higher education should be seen as a central aim of an equal and democratic society. This requires a shift away from the idea of students as consumers, acquiring qualification assets for themselves and skills that the labour market needs. Before we can think about specific policy solutions there needs to be a fundamental ideological, philosophical and discursive shift in how education is viewed within society, including its very purpose. Education is not about 'investing in one's future'. The monetisation of education and the implementation of taken-for-granted ideological approaches to education have been an unmitigated disaster, judged by any key metrics for those involved; there have been increased strikes, a high turnover of staff, plummeting morale, student disengagement, and a huge increase in attainment inequality rates. Education has the potential to be a motor for egalitarian change within society, yet if we do not challenge the currently hegemonic neoliberal narrative, its potential will never be realised","PeriodicalId":45378,"journal":{"name":"SOUNDINGS","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUNDINGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.84-85.10.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dominant discourse around education in the UK has to be challenged. We need to rethink the aims of education, so that it is seen as a public good for society and a democratic right for students: equal access to higher education should be seen as a central aim of an equal and democratic society. This requires a shift away from the idea of students as consumers, acquiring qualification assets for themselves and skills that the labour market needs. Before we can think about specific policy solutions there needs to be a fundamental ideological, philosophical and discursive shift in how education is viewed within society, including its very purpose. Education is not about 'investing in one's future'. The monetisation of education and the implementation of taken-for-granted ideological approaches to education have been an unmitigated disaster, judged by any key metrics for those involved; there have been increased strikes, a high turnover of staff, plummeting morale, student disengagement, and a huge increase in attainment inequality rates. Education has the potential to be a motor for egalitarian change within society, yet if we do not challenge the currently hegemonic neoliberal narrative, its potential will never be realised
如果我们要解决教育危机,主导的意识形态方法必须改变
在英国,围绕教育的主导话语必须受到挑战。我们需要重新思考教育的目标,使其被视为社会的公共利益和学生的民主权利:平等接受高等教育的机会应被视为平等民主社会的中心目标。这需要转变学生作为消费者的观念,为自己获取合格资产和劳动力市场所需的技能。在我们能够考虑具体的政策解决方案之前,我们需要在社会中如何看待教育,包括其目的方面进行根本的意识形态、哲学和话语上的转变。教育不是“投资自己的未来”。从相关人士的任何关键指标来看,教育的货币化,以及对教育实施想当然的意识形态方法,都是一场不折不扣的灾难;罢工增加,员工流动率高,士气低落,学生不参与,成绩不平等率大幅上升。教育有潜力成为社会内平等主义变革的动力,但如果我们不挑战目前占主导地位的新自由主义叙事,其潜力将永远无法实现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SOUNDINGS
SOUNDINGS HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信