Mitochondrial DNA Analysis in Population Isolates: Challenges and Implications for Human Identification

J. R. Connell, R. A. Lea, L. M. Haupt, L. R. Griffiths
{"title":"Mitochondrial DNA Analysis in Population Isolates: Challenges and Implications for Human Identification","authors":"J. R. Connell, R. A. Lea, L. M. Haupt, L. R. Griffiths","doi":"10.1007/s40610-023-00155-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose of Review Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plays an essential role in forensic science, aiding in human identification especially when dealing with degraded DNA samples or cases devoid of paternal family reference samples. Yet, the nuances of isolated populations, shaped by a small number of founders that separate from general populations due to factors such as cultural or geographic differences, and as such, often exhibit very different allele frequencies, pose challenges to its applicability. Recent Findings Recent investigations have determined that ignoring the presence of genetic isolates when performing forensic genetic analysis can introduce significant bias into the results ultimately leading to incorrect match probability estimates, increased false positives or false negatives, miscalculation of familial relationships, ethical and legal concerns, loss of public trust, and mistaken convictions or acquittals. Summary This paper offers a comprehensive review of the challenges and implications for human identification using mtDNA in isolated populations, focusing on population history and social factors; homogeneity of mtDNA; lack of representation in reference databases; and data interpretation and appropriate statistical methods.","PeriodicalId":72737,"journal":{"name":"Current molecular biology reports","volume":"25 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current molecular biology reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40610-023-00155-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plays an essential role in forensic science, aiding in human identification especially when dealing with degraded DNA samples or cases devoid of paternal family reference samples. Yet, the nuances of isolated populations, shaped by a small number of founders that separate from general populations due to factors such as cultural or geographic differences, and as such, often exhibit very different allele frequencies, pose challenges to its applicability. Recent Findings Recent investigations have determined that ignoring the presence of genetic isolates when performing forensic genetic analysis can introduce significant bias into the results ultimately leading to incorrect match probability estimates, increased false positives or false negatives, miscalculation of familial relationships, ethical and legal concerns, loss of public trust, and mistaken convictions or acquittals. Summary This paper offers a comprehensive review of the challenges and implications for human identification using mtDNA in isolated populations, focusing on population history and social factors; homogeneity of mtDNA; lack of representation in reference databases; and data interpretation and appropriate statistical methods.
种群分离物的线粒体DNA分析:挑战和人类鉴定的意义
线粒体DNA (mtDNA)在法医科学中起着至关重要的作用,特别是在处理降解DNA样本或缺乏父系参考样本的案件时,有助于人类鉴定。然而,由于文化或地理差异等因素,少数创始人与一般人群分离,形成了孤立人群的细微差别,因此,往往表现出非常不同的等位基因频率,这对其适用性提出了挑战。最近的调查已经确定,在进行法医遗传分析时忽略遗传分离物的存在可能会给结果带来重大偏差,最终导致不正确的匹配概率估计,假阳性或假阴性增加,家庭关系的错误计算,道德和法律问题,公众信任的丧失以及错误的定罪或无罪释放。本文综述了利用分离种群mtDNA进行人类鉴定的挑战和启示,重点介绍了种群历史和社会因素;mtDNA的均匀性;在参考数据库中缺乏代表性;以及数据解释和适当的统计方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信