Ultrasound parameters for evaluating local hemodynamics of internal carotid artery anomalies

Q4 Medicine
A. V. Pomortsev, K. A. Bagdasaryan, A. N. Sencha
{"title":"Ultrasound parameters for evaluating local hemodynamics of internal carotid artery anomalies","authors":"A. V. Pomortsev, K. A. Bagdasaryan, A. N. Sencha","doi":"10.35401/2541-9897-2023-26-2-40-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the high prevalence of internal carotid artery (ICA) anomalies, there is still no consensus on which parameters should be used to evaluate their local hemodynamics and what significance each parameter holds. Objective: To determine the significance of various ultrasound parameters for evaluating the local hemodynamics of ICA anomalies. Materials and methods: In our cross-sectional observational study 427 outpatients underwent carotid ultrasound. To evaluate the significance of various ultrasound parameters for local hemodynamics assessment, we used a cluster analysis for the entire sample (n = 386), taking into account the deformation coefficient, angle of deformation, blood flow turbulence at the site of maximum deformation, and peak blood flow velocity at the site of maximum deformation. Based on the cluster analysis results, we did a discriminant function analysis. Results: During the clustering of patients from the total sample (n = 386), 3 clusters were formed. We did a discriminant function analysis to evaluate the indicators used. We found that all of them had a small Wilks’ Lambda indicating their greater discriminatory ability. The deformation coefficient was the most significant parameter as it had the smallest value (0.26). “Tolerance” analysis showed that the deformation coefficient is the most independent indicator (0.67). Conclusions: Our study showed that the most significant and independent parameter for evaluating the local hemodynamics of ICA anomalies is the deformation coefficient, with the blood flow turbulence being the least significant parameter.","PeriodicalId":34355,"journal":{"name":"Innovatsionnaia meditsina Kubani","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovatsionnaia meditsina Kubani","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2023-26-2-40-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the high prevalence of internal carotid artery (ICA) anomalies, there is still no consensus on which parameters should be used to evaluate their local hemodynamics and what significance each parameter holds. Objective: To determine the significance of various ultrasound parameters for evaluating the local hemodynamics of ICA anomalies. Materials and methods: In our cross-sectional observational study 427 outpatients underwent carotid ultrasound. To evaluate the significance of various ultrasound parameters for local hemodynamics assessment, we used a cluster analysis for the entire sample (n = 386), taking into account the deformation coefficient, angle of deformation, blood flow turbulence at the site of maximum deformation, and peak blood flow velocity at the site of maximum deformation. Based on the cluster analysis results, we did a discriminant function analysis. Results: During the clustering of patients from the total sample (n = 386), 3 clusters were formed. We did a discriminant function analysis to evaluate the indicators used. We found that all of them had a small Wilks’ Lambda indicating their greater discriminatory ability. The deformation coefficient was the most significant parameter as it had the smallest value (0.26). “Tolerance” analysis showed that the deformation coefficient is the most independent indicator (0.67). Conclusions: Our study showed that the most significant and independent parameter for evaluating the local hemodynamics of ICA anomalies is the deformation coefficient, with the blood flow turbulence being the least significant parameter.
评价颈内动脉局部血流动力学异常的超声参数
背景:尽管颈内动脉(ICA)异常的发病率很高,但对于应该使用哪些参数来评估其局部血流动力学以及每个参数的意义仍然没有达成共识。目的:探讨各种超声参数对评价ICA异常局部血流动力学的意义。材料和方法:在我们的横断面观察研究中,427例门诊患者接受了颈动脉超声检查。为了评估各种超声参数对局部血流动力学评估的意义,我们对整个样本(n = 386)进行聚类分析,考虑变形系数、变形角度、最大变形部位血流湍流度和最大变形部位血流峰值速度。根据聚类分析结果,进行判别函数分析。结果:在对总样本患者(n = 386)进行聚类时,共形成3个聚类。我们做了判别函数分析来评估所使用的指标。我们发现他们都有一个小的威尔克斯λ,这表明他们的歧视能力更强。变形系数是最显著的参数,其值最小(0.26)。“公差”分析表明,变形系数是最独立的指标(0.67)。结论:我们的研究表明,变形系数是评价ICA局部血流动力学最重要、最独立的参数,血流湍流度是最不重要的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovatsionnaia meditsina Kubani
Innovatsionnaia meditsina Kubani Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信