ChatGPT in the English Classroom

Nancy Murray
{"title":"ChatGPT in the English Classroom","authors":"Nancy Murray","doi":"10.52938/tales.v3i1.2890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"18 students engaged in learning about artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT 3 (CHAT), to respond to the question of whether it is ethical or practical for students to use CHAT in college-level classrooms to complete assignments. A thematic unit was created and taught in 2 face-to-face English 101 classes to explore the topic of CHAT. The unit was created with and designed to be completed by CHAT. After reflecting on 3 readings, 2 videos, and completing various related assignments, students were expected to write a 5-page essay about CHAT using CHAT in whatever way they wanted to complete the work while still maintaining the specific requirements of the English 101 objectives. The essays were examined by the students using the same peer review process that we used for 2 essays written without using CHAT before the thematic unit, with the addition of 2 instructions: to check the veracity of the sources, and to evaluate the essays for consistency of tone, accuracy of information, and originality. Data collection for this qualitative study was based on hand-written reflections by 18 of the students in the classroom, quick polls at the end of each lesson, and semi-structured, recorded interviews with 9 of the participating students who volunteered to be recorded. The students were charged with the dual roles of tester and consultant, and it gave them the opportunity to understand and test CHAT in a classroom and to share their insights with faculty. Reflections and interviews were transcribed, coded, analyzed, and categorized into the 3 strongest recommendations for faculty considering using CHAT in their curriculum: (1) faculty should be open-minded and well trained in what CHAT is and how to use it safely before attempting to allow their students to use it in class; (2) students should be given specific instructions for how to use CHAT for specific tasks that will help them reach their potential and then allowed to decide for themselves how to proceed; (3) students should be tested to demonstrate comprehension of the material and classroom objectives both before and after the use of CHAT.","PeriodicalId":488860,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and learning excellence through scholarship","volume":"323 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and learning excellence through scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52938/tales.v3i1.2890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

18 students engaged in learning about artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT 3 (CHAT), to respond to the question of whether it is ethical or practical for students to use CHAT in college-level classrooms to complete assignments. A thematic unit was created and taught in 2 face-to-face English 101 classes to explore the topic of CHAT. The unit was created with and designed to be completed by CHAT. After reflecting on 3 readings, 2 videos, and completing various related assignments, students were expected to write a 5-page essay about CHAT using CHAT in whatever way they wanted to complete the work while still maintaining the specific requirements of the English 101 objectives. The essays were examined by the students using the same peer review process that we used for 2 essays written without using CHAT before the thematic unit, with the addition of 2 instructions: to check the veracity of the sources, and to evaluate the essays for consistency of tone, accuracy of information, and originality. Data collection for this qualitative study was based on hand-written reflections by 18 of the students in the classroom, quick polls at the end of each lesson, and semi-structured, recorded interviews with 9 of the participating students who volunteered to be recorded. The students were charged with the dual roles of tester and consultant, and it gave them the opportunity to understand and test CHAT in a classroom and to share their insights with faculty. Reflections and interviews were transcribed, coded, analyzed, and categorized into the 3 strongest recommendations for faculty considering using CHAT in their curriculum: (1) faculty should be open-minded and well trained in what CHAT is and how to use it safely before attempting to allow their students to use it in class; (2) students should be given specific instructions for how to use CHAT for specific tasks that will help them reach their potential and then allowed to decide for themselves how to proceed; (3) students should be tested to demonstrate comprehension of the material and classroom objectives both before and after the use of CHAT.
在英语课堂上聊天
18名学生参与学习人工智能,特别是ChatGPT 3 (CHAT),以回答学生在大学水平的课堂上使用CHAT完成作业是否合乎道德或实用的问题。我们创建了一个专题单元,并在2节面对面的英语101课中教授,以探索CHAT的主题。该装置是由CHAT创建并设计完成的。在阅读了3篇阅读材料、2个视频并完成了各种相关作业后,学生们被要求写一篇关于CHAT的5页的文章,在保持英语101目标的特定要求的情况下,以任何他们想要的方式使用CHAT完成这项工作。学生们使用与我们在主题单元之前未使用CHAT撰写的两篇论文相同的同行评议过程对论文进行了检查,并增加了2条说明:检查来源的真实性,并评估论文的语气一致性,信息准确性和独创性。这项定性研究的数据收集是基于课堂上18名学生的手写反思,每节课结束时的快速投票,以及对9名自愿参与的学生的半结构化录音采访。学生们承担着测试者和顾问的双重角色,这让他们有机会在课堂上理解和测试CHAT,并与教师分享他们的见解。反思和访谈经过转录、编码、分析,并归类为考虑在课程中使用CHAT的教师的3个最强烈的建议:(1)教师在尝试允许学生在课堂上使用CHAT之前,应该对CHAT是什么以及如何安全使用它持开放态度并受过良好培训;(2)应向学生提供具体指导,说明如何使用CHAT完成有助于他们发挥潜力的特定任务,然后让他们自己决定如何进行;(3)学生在使用CHAT之前和之后都应该接受测试,以证明他们对材料和课堂目标的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信