The effect of simulation-integrated context-based instructional strategy on grade 10 students’ achievement in chemistry

Q4 Social Sciences
Minale Demelash, Woldie Belachew, Dereje Andargie
{"title":"The effect of simulation-integrated context-based instructional strategy on grade 10 students’ achievement in chemistry","authors":"Minale Demelash, Woldie Belachew, Dereje Andargie","doi":"10.29333/pr/13850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine whether a simulation-integrated context-based 7E instructional strategy (SICBIS) could increase students’ achievement in the chemistry of oxides, acids, bases, and salts (COABS) when compared to context-based 7E instructional strategy (CBIS), simulation-integrated conventional teaching approach (SICTA), and conventional teaching approach (CTA). An embedded mixed-method was employed. For the quantitative part, a 25-item chemistry achievement test was utilized to collect data from 229 grade 10 students as part of a quasi-experimental pre-/post-test control group study design. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized to analyse the data. Semi-structured interviews were used to triangulate it the with quantitative results. Quantitative results demonstrated that although difference was not statistically significant, incorporating computer simulations within CBIS helps students do better than they would have without. SICBIS and CBIS outperformed SICTA and CTA in COABS. Also, implications and recommendations are made.","PeriodicalId":32435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pedagogical Research","volume":"234 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pedagogical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether a simulation-integrated context-based 7E instructional strategy (SICBIS) could increase students’ achievement in the chemistry of oxides, acids, bases, and salts (COABS) when compared to context-based 7E instructional strategy (CBIS), simulation-integrated conventional teaching approach (SICTA), and conventional teaching approach (CTA). An embedded mixed-method was employed. For the quantitative part, a 25-item chemistry achievement test was utilized to collect data from 229 grade 10 students as part of a quasi-experimental pre-/post-test control group study design. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized to analyse the data. Semi-structured interviews were used to triangulate it the with quantitative results. Quantitative results demonstrated that although difference was not statistically significant, incorporating computer simulations within CBIS helps students do better than they would have without. SICBIS and CBIS outperformed SICTA and CTA in COABS. Also, implications and recommendations are made.
模拟整合情境教学策略对十年级学生化学成绩的影响
本研究的目的是考察模拟整合情境的7E教学策略(SICBIS)与情境整合的7E教学策略(CBIS)、模拟整合的传统教学方法(SICTA)和传统教学方法(CTA)相比,是否能提高学生在氧化物、酸、碱和盐化学(COABS)方面的成绩。采用嵌入式混合方法。定量部分采用准实验前/后对照组研究设计,采用25项化学成就测验收集229名10年级学生的数据。采用描述性统计和推断性统计对数据进行分析。采用半结构化访谈将其与定量结果进行三角测量。定量结果表明,尽管差异在统计上并不显著,但在CBIS中加入计算机模拟可以帮助学生比没有CBIS的学生做得更好。在COABS中,SICBIS和CBIS优于SICTA和CTA。此外,还提出了启示和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信