Physiotherapy: A potential and novel treatment approach for phantom limb pain in post-amputee patients – A systematic review

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sunny Gautam, Adarsh Kumar Srivastav, Digvijay Sharma
{"title":"Physiotherapy: A potential and novel treatment approach for phantom limb pain in post-amputee patients – A systematic review","authors":"Sunny Gautam, Adarsh Kumar Srivastav, Digvijay Sharma","doi":"10.1177/20494637231197002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate the efficacy of conventional and novel non-pharmacologic, non-invasive therapeutic interventions in physiotherapy for the treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) in post-amputee patients. Methods A systematic search for the articles was conducted in multiple electronic databases such as PUBMED, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), following the PRISMA method and only published articles from the last 12 years (2010–2022) evaluating the efficacy of different physiotherapy interventions for the treatment of PLP in post-amputee patients were included. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the articles were assessed and evaluated by two independent reviewers using the PEDro scale, Methodological index for non-randomized studies scale (MINORS), and Cochrane collaboration’s assessment tool. Result A total of 1840 articles were identified, out of which 17 articles (11 RCTs and 6 pilot studies) were ultimately chosen after the full-text screening. After reviewing the articles, evidence identified in RCTs and pilot studies indicates towards significant improvement in reducing the severity of PLP in post-amputee patients by using different physiotherapy interventions. Conclusion and discussion Physiotherapy interventions with advance modalities and exercises can be used to increase the overall effectiveness of the treatment and to reduce the severity of phantom limb pain in post-amputee patients. However, due to the lack of consistent evidence for a given intervention, it becomes even more difficult to reach a majority consensus as to which intervention better assess all the mechanism of PLP thereby alleviating the problem of PLP in post-amputee patients. Therefore, more rigorous randomized controlled trials will be required in the future to reach a conclusion.","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637231197002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of conventional and novel non-pharmacologic, non-invasive therapeutic interventions in physiotherapy for the treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) in post-amputee patients. Methods A systematic search for the articles was conducted in multiple electronic databases such as PUBMED, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), following the PRISMA method and only published articles from the last 12 years (2010–2022) evaluating the efficacy of different physiotherapy interventions for the treatment of PLP in post-amputee patients were included. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the articles were assessed and evaluated by two independent reviewers using the PEDro scale, Methodological index for non-randomized studies scale (MINORS), and Cochrane collaboration’s assessment tool. Result A total of 1840 articles were identified, out of which 17 articles (11 RCTs and 6 pilot studies) were ultimately chosen after the full-text screening. After reviewing the articles, evidence identified in RCTs and pilot studies indicates towards significant improvement in reducing the severity of PLP in post-amputee patients by using different physiotherapy interventions. Conclusion and discussion Physiotherapy interventions with advance modalities and exercises can be used to increase the overall effectiveness of the treatment and to reduce the severity of phantom limb pain in post-amputee patients. However, due to the lack of consistent evidence for a given intervention, it becomes even more difficult to reach a majority consensus as to which intervention better assess all the mechanism of PLP thereby alleviating the problem of PLP in post-amputee patients. Therefore, more rigorous randomized controlled trials will be required in the future to reach a conclusion.
物理治疗:一种治疗截肢后幻肢痛的新方法——系统综述
目的评价传统和新型非药物、非侵入性理疗干预对截肢后幻肢痛(PLP)的治疗效果。方法系统检索PUBMED、Google Scholar、EMBASE、Cochrane library和物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)等多个电子数据库,采用PRISMA方法,选取近12年(2010-2022年)发表的评价不同物理治疗干预措施治疗截肢后PLP疗效的文章。本文的方法学质量和偏倚风险由两名独立审稿人使用PEDro量表、非随机研究方法学指数量表(minor)和Cochrane合作评估工具进行评估和评价。结果共纳入文献1840篇,经全文筛选,最终入选文献17篇(11篇rct, 6篇先导研究)。在回顾文章后,在随机对照试验和试点研究中发现的证据表明,通过使用不同的物理治疗干预措施,可以显著改善截肢后患者PLP的严重程度。结论与讨论物理治疗干预与先进的模式和运动可以提高治疗的整体有效性,减轻截肢后患者幻肢痛的严重程度。然而,由于某一干预措施缺乏一致的证据,对于哪种干预措施能更好地评估PLP的所有机制,从而减轻截肢后患者PLP的问题,很难达成多数共识。因此,未来需要更严格的随机对照试验来得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信