Silvicultural treatments improve pest and disease conditions of white pine (Pinus strobus) residual trees and regeneration

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Isabel Alvarez Munck, Mariko Yamasaki, Jon Janelle
{"title":"Silvicultural treatments improve pest and disease conditions of white pine (Pinus strobus) residual trees and regeneration","authors":"Isabel Alvarez Munck, Mariko Yamasaki, Jon Janelle","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1239835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Managing multiple forest insect pests and diseases is challenging. For example, in eastern white pine ( Pinus strobus ) stands whereas partial shading and high seedling density is encouraged to reduce damage by white pine blister rust ( Cronartium ribicola ) and white pine weevil ( Pissodes strobi ), dense conditions in the understory may increase damage by foliar diseases such as brown spot needle blight ( Lecanosticta acicola ) and Caliciopsis canker ( Caliciopsis pinea ). We evaluated the effect of silvicultural treatments, shelterwoods (residual basal area < 18 m 2 ha −1 ), low density thinnings (residual basal area ≤ 14 m 2 ha −1 ), patch cuts (1.2 ha openings), and untreated controls on damage by these insect pest and diseases in residual overstory trees and regeneration. Shelterwoods and low density thinnings provided a good balance of some shading and reduced stem density, which resulted in less weevil damage and foliar disease severity. Crown condition and quality of regeneration was better in all treatments compared to unmanaged controls. Shelterwoods, low density thinnings and patch cuts have the added benefit on increasing seral habitat, resulting in greater songbird diversity.","PeriodicalId":12538,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1239835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing multiple forest insect pests and diseases is challenging. For example, in eastern white pine ( Pinus strobus ) stands whereas partial shading and high seedling density is encouraged to reduce damage by white pine blister rust ( Cronartium ribicola ) and white pine weevil ( Pissodes strobi ), dense conditions in the understory may increase damage by foliar diseases such as brown spot needle blight ( Lecanosticta acicola ) and Caliciopsis canker ( Caliciopsis pinea ). We evaluated the effect of silvicultural treatments, shelterwoods (residual basal area < 18 m 2 ha −1 ), low density thinnings (residual basal area ≤ 14 m 2 ha −1 ), patch cuts (1.2 ha openings), and untreated controls on damage by these insect pest and diseases in residual overstory trees and regeneration. Shelterwoods and low density thinnings provided a good balance of some shading and reduced stem density, which resulted in less weevil damage and foliar disease severity. Crown condition and quality of regeneration was better in all treatments compared to unmanaged controls. Shelterwoods, low density thinnings and patch cuts have the added benefit on increasing seral habitat, resulting in greater songbird diversity.
造林处理改善了白松残树病虫害状况和再生
管理多种森林病虫害具有挑战性。例如,在东部白松林分,虽然鼓励部分遮阳和高幼苗密度以减少白松水疱锈病(Cronartium ribicola)和白松象牙虫(Pissodes strobi)的危害,但林下茂密的条件可能会增加褐斑针叶枯病(Lecanosticta acicola)和Caliciopsis canker (Caliciopsis pinea)等叶面疾病的危害。评价了不同造林措施、防护林(残基面积;18平方米2公顷−1),低密度疏林(剩余基材面积≤14平方米2公顷−1),斑块切割(1.2公顷的开口),以及未经处理的控制这些病虫害对剩余上层树木的损害和更新。防护林和低密度疏林在一定程度上平衡了遮荫和降低茎密度,降低了象鼻虫危害和叶面病害的严重程度。与未处理的对照组相比,所有处理的冠状态和再生质量都更好。防护林、低密度的疏林和小块的砍伐对增加一些栖息地有额外的好处,导致更大的鸣禽多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
256
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信