Accounting for Equity Financial Instruments Under IFRS 9: Determinants and Usefulness

Zeting Zang
{"title":"Accounting for Equity Financial Instruments Under IFRS 9: Determinants and Usefulness","authors":"Zeting Zang","doi":"10.24135/rangahau-aranga.v2i3.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This oral presentation aims to discuss the results of my study regarding the determinants and usefulness of accounting for equity financial instruments after the effect of the new accounting standard: International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9 Financial Instruments. The prohibition of recycling fair value gains or losses (FVGL) on equity instruments from other comprehensive income (OCI) to profit or loss when derecognition and the default fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) presentation with alternative fair value through OCI (FVTOCI) option are some major changes for equity financial instruments accounting in IFRS 9. Motivated by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)’s continuing monitoring implementation evidence on equity instruments classification and measurement, I examine firms’ accounting choices in presenting FVGL on EFA either at FVTOCI or at FVTPL under the framework of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and whether the presentation location matters to investors in ASX 500 firms. I find that firms’ EFA holdings are not changed after IFRS 9 in terms of whether to hold an EFA or EFA holding amount. FVGL on EFA presentation location choice is not used opportunistically in firms to smooth earnings or increase profitability. However, information asymmetry for FVTOCI presentation choice increased after IFRS 9 adoption in non-financial firms. EFA amount in financial firms provides incremental value relevance to the market regardless of IFRS 9 adoption, and the EFA presentation location matters to investors. The results of this study provide evidence to standard setters to understand the determinants and usefulness of EFA under IFRS 9, which has implications for further revisions. I contribute to the debate around whether to recycle FVGL from OCI or not. Moreover, I extend accounting choice and value relevance literature in financial instruments accounting that is of value to a broad constituency, such as managers, investors, and various financial statement users.","PeriodicalId":491085,"journal":{"name":"Rangahau Aranga AUT Graduate Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangahau Aranga AUT Graduate Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/rangahau-aranga.v2i3.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This oral presentation aims to discuss the results of my study regarding the determinants and usefulness of accounting for equity financial instruments after the effect of the new accounting standard: International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9 Financial Instruments. The prohibition of recycling fair value gains or losses (FVGL) on equity instruments from other comprehensive income (OCI) to profit or loss when derecognition and the default fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) presentation with alternative fair value through OCI (FVTOCI) option are some major changes for equity financial instruments accounting in IFRS 9. Motivated by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)’s continuing monitoring implementation evidence on equity instruments classification and measurement, I examine firms’ accounting choices in presenting FVGL on EFA either at FVTOCI or at FVTPL under the framework of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and whether the presentation location matters to investors in ASX 500 firms. I find that firms’ EFA holdings are not changed after IFRS 9 in terms of whether to hold an EFA or EFA holding amount. FVGL on EFA presentation location choice is not used opportunistically in firms to smooth earnings or increase profitability. However, information asymmetry for FVTOCI presentation choice increased after IFRS 9 adoption in non-financial firms. EFA amount in financial firms provides incremental value relevance to the market regardless of IFRS 9 adoption, and the EFA presentation location matters to investors. The results of this study provide evidence to standard setters to understand the determinants and usefulness of EFA under IFRS 9, which has implications for further revisions. I contribute to the debate around whether to recycle FVGL from OCI or not. Moreover, I extend accounting choice and value relevance literature in financial instruments accounting that is of value to a broad constituency, such as managers, investors, and various financial statement users.
《国际财务报告准则第9号》下权益金融工具的会计核算:决定因素和有用性
本口头报告旨在讨论我关于新会计准则:国际财务报告准则(IFRS) 9金融工具生效后权益金融工具会计的决定因素和有用性的研究结果。禁止权益工具的公允价值利得或损失(FVGL)从其他综合收益(OCI)转到终止确认时的损益,以及通过盈利或损失(FVTPL)列报的默认公允价值(FVTPL)与通过OCI (FVTOCI)选择的替代公允价值是IFRS 9中权益金融工具会计的一些主要变化。受国际会计准则理事会(IASB)对权益工具分类和计量的持续监测实施证据的激励,我在积极会计理论(PAT)的框架下,研究了公司在FVTOCI或FVTPL上在EFA上呈现FVGL的会计选择,以及呈现地点对ASX 500公司的投资者是否重要。我发现,在IFRS 9之后,公司的EFA持有量在是否持有EFA或EFA持有量方面并没有改变。FVGL对EFA呈现的位置选择并没有在公司中被投机地用于平滑收益或增加盈利能力。然而,非金融公司采用IFRS 9后,FVTOCI列报选择的信息不对称增加。金融公司的EFA金额提供了与市场相关的增量价值,无论是否采用IFRS 9,而EFA列报地点对投资者很重要。本研究的结果为准则制定者了解IFRS 9下EFA的决定因素和有用性提供了证据,这对进一步修订具有启示意义。我参与了关于是否从OCI中回收FVGL的辩论。此外,我还扩展了金融工具会计中的会计选择和价值相关文献,这些文献对管理者、投资者和各种财务报表用户等广泛群体有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信