Assessing Metastasis through Positron Emission Tomography (PET): An In-depth Analysis and Mapping of Thematic Clusters and Prevailing Topics in Nuclear Medicine Research
{"title":"Assessing Metastasis through Positron Emission Tomography (PET): An In-depth Analysis and Mapping of Thematic Clusters and Prevailing Topics in Nuclear Medicine Research","authors":"Hamdi Afşin","doi":"10.36472/msd.v10i10.1061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The primary objective of the study is to conduct a critical evaluation of thematic categories within the field of nuclear medicine literature, specifically focusing on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging techniques and the detection and evaluation of metastasis, through the application of bibliometric analysis methods. Method: Co-citation, co-occurrence and co-authorship analyses were performed on 588 academic publications selected using the Web of Science database. The analyses were performed using R-based Bibliometrix software, Python and Microsoft Excel. Results: The findings derived from the co-citation and co-occurrence network analyses shed light on the intricate nature of thematic categories within the nuclear medicine literature and provide insights into the core topics. Topics such as metastasis and tumor staging, optimisation of imaging methodology, and standardisation of clinical practice are prominent topics in the study. In particular, a single-authored article has been observed to make a significant contribution to knowledge on the efficacy of different radioactive markers used in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. Conclusion: This bibliometric assessment addresses the multidisciplinary and thematic dimensions of an in-depth understanding of the field of nuclear medicine. The study effectively identified four main thematic clusters 'PET and Cancer Types', 'FDG-PET ', 'Prostate Cancer and Recurrence', and 'Cancer Management and Imaging' and highlights the interrelatedness and importance of these categories.","PeriodicalId":18486,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science and Discovery","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science and Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36472/msd.v10i10.1061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of the study is to conduct a critical evaluation of thematic categories within the field of nuclear medicine literature, specifically focusing on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging techniques and the detection and evaluation of metastasis, through the application of bibliometric analysis methods. Method: Co-citation, co-occurrence and co-authorship analyses were performed on 588 academic publications selected using the Web of Science database. The analyses were performed using R-based Bibliometrix software, Python and Microsoft Excel. Results: The findings derived from the co-citation and co-occurrence network analyses shed light on the intricate nature of thematic categories within the nuclear medicine literature and provide insights into the core topics. Topics such as metastasis and tumor staging, optimisation of imaging methodology, and standardisation of clinical practice are prominent topics in the study. In particular, a single-authored article has been observed to make a significant contribution to knowledge on the efficacy of different radioactive markers used in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. Conclusion: This bibliometric assessment addresses the multidisciplinary and thematic dimensions of an in-depth understanding of the field of nuclear medicine. The study effectively identified four main thematic clusters 'PET and Cancer Types', 'FDG-PET ', 'Prostate Cancer and Recurrence', and 'Cancer Management and Imaging' and highlights the interrelatedness and importance of these categories.
目的:本研究的主要目的是通过应用文献计量学分析方法,对核医学文献领域的专题分类进行批判性评估,特别是正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像技术和转移的检测和评估。方法:对Web of Science数据库中588篇学术出版物进行共被引、共现和合著分析。使用基于r的Bibliometrix软件、Python和Microsoft Excel进行分析。结果:共被引和共现网络分析的结果揭示了核医学文献中主题类别的复杂性,并提供了对核心主题的见解。诸如转移和肿瘤分期、影像学方法的优化和临床实践的标准化等主题是研究的突出主题。特别是,一篇单作者的文章被观察到对神经内分泌肿瘤诊断中使用的不同放射性标记物的功效的知识做出了重大贡献。结论:这个文献计量评估解决了深入了解核医学领域的多学科和主题维度。该研究有效地确定了四个主要的主题集群“PET和癌症类型”、“FDG-PET”、“前列腺癌和复发”以及“癌症管理和成像”,并强调了这些类别的相互关联性和重要性。