Profiting from Most-Favored-Customer Procurement Rules: Evidence from Medicaid

IF 5.6 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Josh Feng, Thomas Hwang, Luca Maini
{"title":"Profiting from Most-Favored-Customer Procurement Rules: Evidence from Medicaid","authors":"Josh Feng, Thomas Hwang, Luca Maini","doi":"10.1257/pol.20200688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a difference-in-difference approach, we find that an increase to Medicaid’s minimum drug rebate under the Affordable Care Act in 2010 lowered non-Medicaid drug spending by 2.5 percent. A stylized bargaining model shows that this is likely driven by the interaction of this reform with Medicaid’s “most-favored customer” clause (MFCC). By examining the response of drugs that faced a change in incentives equivalent to the removal of Medicaid’s MFCC, we estimate that removing the Medicaid MFCC would have reduced overall 2010 non-Medicaid drug spending by an additional 3.5 percent, though it would have likely also increased Medicaid spending. (JEL C78, H51, I18, I38, L65)","PeriodicalId":48093,"journal":{"name":"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a difference-in-difference approach, we find that an increase to Medicaid’s minimum drug rebate under the Affordable Care Act in 2010 lowered non-Medicaid drug spending by 2.5 percent. A stylized bargaining model shows that this is likely driven by the interaction of this reform with Medicaid’s “most-favored customer” clause (MFCC). By examining the response of drugs that faced a change in incentives equivalent to the removal of Medicaid’s MFCC, we estimate that removing the Medicaid MFCC would have reduced overall 2010 non-Medicaid drug spending by an additional 3.5 percent, though it would have likely also increased Medicaid spending. (JEL C78, H51, I18, I38, L65)
从最优惠客户采购规则中获利:来自医疗补助的证据
使用差异中的差异方法,我们发现2010年《平价医疗法案》下医疗补助最低药品回扣的增加使非医疗补助药品支出降低了2.5%。一个程式化的讨价还价模型表明,这可能是由这项改革与医疗补助的“最优惠客户”条款(MFCC)的相互作用推动的。通过研究那些面临激励变化的药品的反应,相当于取消医疗补助的MFCC,我们估计,取消医疗补助的MFCC将使2010年非医疗补助药物的总体支出额外减少3.5%,尽管这可能也会增加医疗补助的支出。(jel c78, h51, i18, i38, l65)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Economic Review (AER) is a general-interest economics journal. The journal publishes 12 issues containing articles on a broad range of topics. Established in 1911, the AER is among the nation's oldest and most respected scholarly journals in economics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy publishes papers covering a range of topics, the common theme being the role of economic policy in economic outcomes. Subject areas include public economics; urban and regional economics; public policy aspects of health, education, welfare and political institutions; law and economics; economic regulation; and environmental and natural resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信