Facets of Gender Stereotypes Change: A Systematic Literature Review

K. G. Priyashantha, A. C. De Alwis, I. Welmilla
{"title":"Facets of Gender Stereotypes Change: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"K. G. Priyashantha, A. C. De Alwis, I. Welmilla","doi":"10.4038/kjm.v12i1.7689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic literature review paper highlights the definitions, dimensions, and various outcomes associated with the changing gender stereotypes. Using PRISMA article selection guidelines, Sixty articles were selected that were published during the 1970-2020 period in Scopus and LENS.ORG databases. The results found that the definition of people’s attitudes towards adopting the culturally defined social role of the opposite biological sex is ideal for being globally applied. The most used dimensions found in studies are agency and communion. Depending on the surface nature of gender stereotypes change outcomes found, only a few outcomes are favorable to the economy. There are more negative related outcomes in the family, work, and health clusters. It implies that future research needs to consider overcoming these adverse outcomes. Besides, a gap was identified in gender stereotype change in the technology landscape, and future research needs more focus on these areas. Moreover, the definitions, dimensions, and consequences synthesized in this paper provide insights to build an extended theoretical foundation for gender research in the future. This study had a limited number of articles inclusion because only two databases were selected for article retrieval.","PeriodicalId":32766,"journal":{"name":"Kelaniya Journal of Management","volume":"209 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kelaniya Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/kjm.v12i1.7689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This systematic literature review paper highlights the definitions, dimensions, and various outcomes associated with the changing gender stereotypes. Using PRISMA article selection guidelines, Sixty articles were selected that were published during the 1970-2020 period in Scopus and LENS.ORG databases. The results found that the definition of people’s attitudes towards adopting the culturally defined social role of the opposite biological sex is ideal for being globally applied. The most used dimensions found in studies are agency and communion. Depending on the surface nature of gender stereotypes change outcomes found, only a few outcomes are favorable to the economy. There are more negative related outcomes in the family, work, and health clusters. It implies that future research needs to consider overcoming these adverse outcomes. Besides, a gap was identified in gender stereotype change in the technology landscape, and future research needs more focus on these areas. Moreover, the definitions, dimensions, and consequences synthesized in this paper provide insights to build an extended theoretical foundation for gender research in the future. This study had a limited number of articles inclusion because only two databases were selected for article retrieval.
性别刻板印象改变的各个方面:系统的文献综述
这篇系统的文献综述论文强调了与性别刻板印象变化相关的定义、维度和各种结果。使用PRISMA文章选择指南,选择了1970-2020年期间在Scopus和LENS中发表的60篇文章。组织数据库。结果发现,人们对接受文化定义的异性社会角色的态度的定义是全球适用的理想选择。研究中使用最多的维度是代理和交流。根据性别刻板印象改变结果的表面性质,只有少数结果对经济有利。在家庭、工作和健康组群中有更多的负面相关结果。这意味着未来的研究需要考虑克服这些不良后果。此外,性别刻板印象在技术领域的变化存在差距,未来的研究需要进一步关注这些领域。此外,本文综合的定义、维度和结果为未来的性别研究提供了扩展的理论基础。本研究纳入的文章数量有限,因为只选择了两个数据库进行文章检索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信