Vocational knowledge development during teacher-student interactions: exploring vocational conversations

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
H. Schaap, A. Khaled, M. Faber, N. Bijlsma, E. De Bruijn
{"title":"Vocational knowledge development during teacher-student interactions: exploring vocational conversations","authors":"H. Schaap, A. Khaled, M. Faber, N. Bijlsma, E. De Bruijn","doi":"10.59302/ps.v100i1.13990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vocational education aims to enhance students’ vocational knowledge development. However, which pedagogies enhance such development is not self-evident. This article therefore explores vocational knowledge development during vocational conversations between teachers and students. Vocational knowledge development is viewed here from a cultural-historical stance, referring to its situated and social nature. The study is conducted in senior secondary vocational education in the Netherlands, in the domain of Sport Instruction. Four types of vocational conversations were identified, namely: performance-oriented conversations, concept-informed conversations, problem-based conversations and professional identity conversations. The conversations differ in their meaning, nature and context. Meaning refers to the vocational content of the conversations, nature to the way the conversations are regulated and context to characteristics of the learning environment and practical circumstances. Performance-oriented conversations and problem-based conversations were most frequently observed. Implications of these results are discussed from the perspective of teachers in their role as significant other.","PeriodicalId":54044,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogische Studien","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogische Studien","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59302/ps.v100i1.13990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vocational education aims to enhance students’ vocational knowledge development. However, which pedagogies enhance such development is not self-evident. This article therefore explores vocational knowledge development during vocational conversations between teachers and students. Vocational knowledge development is viewed here from a cultural-historical stance, referring to its situated and social nature. The study is conducted in senior secondary vocational education in the Netherlands, in the domain of Sport Instruction. Four types of vocational conversations were identified, namely: performance-oriented conversations, concept-informed conversations, problem-based conversations and professional identity conversations. The conversations differ in their meaning, nature and context. Meaning refers to the vocational content of the conversations, nature to the way the conversations are regulated and context to characteristics of the learning environment and practical circumstances. Performance-oriented conversations and problem-based conversations were most frequently observed. Implications of these results are discussed from the perspective of teachers in their role as significant other.
师生互动中的职业知识发展:探究职业对话
职业教育的目的是促进学生职业知识的发展。然而,哪种教学法促进了这种发展并不明显。因此,本文探讨了在师生职业对话中职业知识的发展。本文从文化历史的角度来看待职业知识发展,指的是职业知识发展的情境性和社会性。这项研究是在荷兰的高中职业教育中进行的,在体育教学领域。职业对话分为四种类型,即:绩效导向对话、概念导向对话、问题导向对话和职业认同对话。这些对话的意义、性质和语境各不相同。意义指的是会话的职业内容,自然指的是规范会话的方式,语境指的是学习环境和实际情况的特点。以绩效为导向的对话和以问题为基础的对话是最常见的。本文从教师作为重要他者的角度讨论了这些结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogische Studien
Pedagogische Studien EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信