Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as One-Step Procedure for Patients with Obesity: Long-Term Outcomes of a Single Center

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Hilmi Yazici, Ahmet Mucteba Ozturk, Ahmet Cekic, Ahmet Can Yasar, Mehmet Yildirim
{"title":"Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as One-Step Procedure for Patients with Obesity: Long-Term Outcomes of a Single Center","authors":"Hilmi Yazici, Ahmet Mucteba Ozturk, Ahmet Cekic, Ahmet Can Yasar, Mehmet Yildirim","doi":"10.1089/bari.2023.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most popular procedure in the past decade. The aim of this study is to evaluate the weight loss and weight regain (WR) results of LSG at a single center. Materials and Methods: The patients who underwent LSG between 2015 and 2018 were examined. The percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%), percentage of total weight loss (TWL%), and body mass index (BMI) were reported. WR was defined as patients who regained >25% of the peak median EWL%. Failure in weight loss (FWL) was defined as EWL% <50%. Comorbidity resolutions were recorded. Results: A total number of 202 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 59 (interquartile range: 18) months. The baseline median BMI was 47.6 kg/m2. The peak median EWL and TWL were 89.5% and 42%, respectively. The median EWL and TWL at the median 5 years follow-up were 70% and 34%, respectively. No WR was reported in the first 3 years. The number of patients with WR and rates during the follow-up were as follows: 2 (1%) in 4 years, 25 (12%) in 5 years, 42 (21%) in 6 years, 58 (29%) in 7 years, and 62 (31%) patients in 8 years follow-up. The WR group has a significantly shorter time to reach the peak median EWL% and the lowest median BMI. FWL was observed in 38 patients, and 31 (82%) of them also showed WR. Total remission rates of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus were 65% and 77%, respectively. Conclusion: Although LSG shows excellent outcomes in short-term follow-ups, more extended follow-ups showed unsatisfying results. In 8 years, almost one in three patients showed WR in this series. The patient-based treatment options might be more appropriate in bariatric surgeries.","PeriodicalId":48848,"journal":{"name":"Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2023.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most popular procedure in the past decade. The aim of this study is to evaluate the weight loss and weight regain (WR) results of LSG at a single center. Materials and Methods: The patients who underwent LSG between 2015 and 2018 were examined. The percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%), percentage of total weight loss (TWL%), and body mass index (BMI) were reported. WR was defined as patients who regained >25% of the peak median EWL%. Failure in weight loss (FWL) was defined as EWL% <50%. Comorbidity resolutions were recorded. Results: A total number of 202 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 59 (interquartile range: 18) months. The baseline median BMI was 47.6 kg/m2. The peak median EWL and TWL were 89.5% and 42%, respectively. The median EWL and TWL at the median 5 years follow-up were 70% and 34%, respectively. No WR was reported in the first 3 years. The number of patients with WR and rates during the follow-up were as follows: 2 (1%) in 4 years, 25 (12%) in 5 years, 42 (21%) in 6 years, 58 (29%) in 7 years, and 62 (31%) patients in 8 years follow-up. The WR group has a significantly shorter time to reach the peak median EWL% and the lowest median BMI. FWL was observed in 38 patients, and 31 (82%) of them also showed WR. Total remission rates of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus were 65% and 77%, respectively. Conclusion: Although LSG shows excellent outcomes in short-term follow-ups, more extended follow-ups showed unsatisfying results. In 8 years, almost one in three patients showed WR in this series. The patient-based treatment options might be more appropriate in bariatric surgeries.
腹腔镜袖式胃切除术作为肥胖症患者的一步手术:单一中心的长期结果
背景:近十年来,腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)已成为最流行的手术。本研究的目的是在单一中心评估LSG的体重减轻和体重恢复(WR)结果。材料与方法:选取2015 - 2018年间行LSG的患者作为研究对象。报告超重减重百分比(EWL%)、总减重百分比(TWL%)和体重指数(BMI)。WR被定义为患者恢复超过峰值中位EWL%的25%。体重减轻失败(FWL)定义为EWL% <50%。记录共病解决方案。结果:共纳入202例患者。中位随访时间为59个月(四分位数间距为18个月)。基线中位BMI为47.6 kg/m2。EWL和TWL的峰值中位数分别为89.5%和42%。中位5年随访时EWL和TWL分别为70%和34%。前3年无WR报告。随访期间WR患者数及发生率为:4年2例(1%),5年25例(12%),6年42例(21%),7年58例(29%),8年62例(31%)。WR组达到EWL%中值峰值和BMI中值最低的时间显著缩短。38例患者出现FWL,其中31例(82%)出现WR。高血压和2型糖尿病的总缓解率分别为65%和77%。结论:LSG短期随访效果良好,但长期随访效果不理想。在8年的时间里,几乎三分之一的患者出现了WR。以患者为基础的治疗方案可能更适合于减肥手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care is the essential peer-reviewed journal delivering clinical best practices and quality updates for achieving optimal bariatric surgical outcomes. Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care coverage includes: Quality outcomes measurement and reporting Process innovations and care delivery Short- and long-term surgical complications Pre-surgical diagnosis and consultation Pre-op, peri-op, and post-op standards of practice Patient access Patient safety issues Nutritional and dietary support Bariatric surgical emergencies Best practices and current standards for bariatric surgery Culture and ethics Body contouring and reconstructive surgery Bariatric teamwork and communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信