Impact of authorship on citation rates: a comparative analysis of top 9999 articles in social science

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Mehmet Firat, Eda Atasoy
{"title":"Impact of authorship on citation rates: a comparative analysis of top 9999 articles in social science","authors":"Mehmet Firat, Eda Atasoy","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2266575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractPublishing in high-impact journals scanned in prestigious indexes and getting as many citations as possible have been the sources of recognition and credibility for researchers. On the other hand, there has been seen a change in authorship trends over the years. A key trend observed in authorship these days has been the decline of single-authored publications and the rise of multiple-authored ones. The relationship between authorship and citation rates remains unclear, though. Only a limited scope of studies has compared single and multiple-authored articles regarding citation rates, especially in social sciences. This research aims to determine whether there is a difference between single and multiple-authored social sciences journal articles in terms of citations they receive and, if so, to provide insights into the possible reasons behind this difference. The quantitative and qualitative data collected revealed four findings. First, in the field of social sciences, single-authored articles receive more citations than multiple-authored ones. Second, although multiple authorship brings multiple perspectives, it may harm the unity and cohesion of an article. Third, single-authored articles have a smooth and fluent style, which makes them easier to read. Last, the articles with a single author require more field expertise and deeper analyzes.KEYWORDS: Citation ratesauthorshipsocial science researchsingle authorshipmultiple authorship Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 “Publish or perish” sums up the pressure on scholars to publish academic papers in peer-reviewed journals on a regular basis as a requirement for career progression, tenure, and academic reputation. While this pressure promotes the circulation of scholarly works and discourse, it also has negative consequences, such as fostering the publication of low-quality papers and creating a stressful professional environment.2 Query String for Scopus Advanced Search.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMehmet FiratProf. Dr. Mehmet Firat is full professor of educational technology at Anadolu University, Faculty of Education. His research interest areas are open and distance learning, educational technology, e-learning, cyber behaviors, learning analytics, and AI in education.Eda AtasoyDr. Eda Atasoy is a lecturer of English at Anadolu University. She gained her MA in the field of English Language Teaching from Bilkent University in 2012 and her PhD, in the field of Distance Education at Anadolu University. Her interest areas are open and distance learning, research methods, open and distance learning theories, and rhizomatic learning.","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2266575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractPublishing in high-impact journals scanned in prestigious indexes and getting as many citations as possible have been the sources of recognition and credibility for researchers. On the other hand, there has been seen a change in authorship trends over the years. A key trend observed in authorship these days has been the decline of single-authored publications and the rise of multiple-authored ones. The relationship between authorship and citation rates remains unclear, though. Only a limited scope of studies has compared single and multiple-authored articles regarding citation rates, especially in social sciences. This research aims to determine whether there is a difference between single and multiple-authored social sciences journal articles in terms of citations they receive and, if so, to provide insights into the possible reasons behind this difference. The quantitative and qualitative data collected revealed four findings. First, in the field of social sciences, single-authored articles receive more citations than multiple-authored ones. Second, although multiple authorship brings multiple perspectives, it may harm the unity and cohesion of an article. Third, single-authored articles have a smooth and fluent style, which makes them easier to read. Last, the articles with a single author require more field expertise and deeper analyzes.KEYWORDS: Citation ratesauthorshipsocial science researchsingle authorshipmultiple authorship Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 “Publish or perish” sums up the pressure on scholars to publish academic papers in peer-reviewed journals on a regular basis as a requirement for career progression, tenure, and academic reputation. While this pressure promotes the circulation of scholarly works and discourse, it also has negative consequences, such as fostering the publication of low-quality papers and creating a stressful professional environment.2 Query String for Scopus Advanced Search.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMehmet FiratProf. Dr. Mehmet Firat is full professor of educational technology at Anadolu University, Faculty of Education. His research interest areas are open and distance learning, educational technology, e-learning, cyber behaviors, learning analytics, and AI in education.Eda AtasoyDr. Eda Atasoy is a lecturer of English at Anadolu University. She gained her MA in the field of English Language Teaching from Bilkent University in 2012 and her PhD, in the field of Distance Education at Anadolu University. Her interest areas are open and distance learning, research methods, open and distance learning theories, and rhizomatic learning.
作者身份对引文率的影响:对9999篇社会科学论文的比较分析
摘要在高影响力期刊上发表论文并获得尽可能多的引用是科研人员获得认可和可信度的来源。另一方面,近年来作者身份的趋势也发生了变化。在作者身份方面观察到的一个关键趋势是,单作者发表的论文数量下降,多作者发表的论文数量上升。然而,作者身份和引用率之间的关系尚不清楚。只有有限范围的研究比较了单作者和多作者的文章的引用率,特别是在社会科学领域。本研究旨在确定单作者和多作者的社会科学期刊文章在引用次数方面是否存在差异,如果存在差异,则提供这种差异背后可能原因的见解。收集的定量和定性数据揭示了四个发现。首先,在社会科学领域,单作者论文比多作者论文获得更多的引用。第二,虽然多作者身份带来了多个视角,但可能会损害文章的统一性和凝聚力。第三,单作者的文章风格流畅,易于阅读。最后,单一作者的文章需要更多的领域专业知识和更深入的分析。关键词:引文率作者社会科学研究单一作者多重作者披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1“要么发表,要么灭亡”概括了学者们面临的压力,他们必须定期在同行评议的期刊上发表学术论文,这是职业发展、终身教职和学术声誉的一项要求。虽然这种压力促进了学术著作和话语的流通,但它也有负面影响,比如促进了低质量论文的发表,创造了一个紧张的专业环境Scopus高级搜索查询字符串。关于贡献者的说明:Mehmet Firat博士是阿纳多卢大学教育学院教育技术专业的正教授。他的研究兴趣包括开放和远程教育、教育技术、电子学习、网络行为、学习分析和教育中的人工智能。Eda AtasoyDr。Eda Atasoy是阿纳多卢大学的英语讲师。她于2012年在比尔肯特大学获得英语语言教学硕士学位,并在阿纳多卢大学获得远程教育博士学位。她的兴趣领域是开放和远程学习,研究方法,开放和远程学习理论,以及根茎式学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: European integration and enlargement pose fundamental challenges for policy, politics, citizenship, culture and democracy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research provides a unique forum for discussing these processes. It welcomes articles on all aspects of European developments that contribute to the improvement of social science knowledge and to the setting of a policy-focused European research agenda. Examples of typical subject areas covered include •Policy-Making and Agenda-Setting •Multilevel Governance •The Role of Institutions •Democracy and Civil Society •Social Structures and Integration •Sustainability and Ecological Modernisation •Science, Research, Technology and Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信