The Social Construction of Risk: Evidence from UK Banks

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Dominic Roberts, Ekililu Salifu
{"title":"The Social Construction of Risk: Evidence from UK Banks","authors":"Dominic Roberts, Ekililu Salifu","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v18i2-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents empirical evidence of the perceptions of risk in UK operating banks and how these perceptions influence risk processes at these institutions. We used social constructivism to understand the views of UK managers in the banking industry. The study found that there was a divide in risk perception among risk managers in UK operating banks. Such a divide is crucial in explaining the differences in risk approach and risk processes in the banking industry. The discussion presented is based on the results of 25 semi-structured interviews. Two distinct characterizations of risk emerged from the data. One perceived risk as a calculable, measurable construct that can be managed, controlled and verified. The other conceived risk as a mixture of mathematical numerics and social ideals that engages an understanding of and appreciation for the concept. Each viewpoint represents an opportunity to fathom risk in its own context, contributing to the critical debate on risk management. The extent to which social factors influence risk decisions varied among banking institutions. Keywords: risk, risk management, social construction, banks","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v18i2-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research presents empirical evidence of the perceptions of risk in UK operating banks and how these perceptions influence risk processes at these institutions. We used social constructivism to understand the views of UK managers in the banking industry. The study found that there was a divide in risk perception among risk managers in UK operating banks. Such a divide is crucial in explaining the differences in risk approach and risk processes in the banking industry. The discussion presented is based on the results of 25 semi-structured interviews. Two distinct characterizations of risk emerged from the data. One perceived risk as a calculable, measurable construct that can be managed, controlled and verified. The other conceived risk as a mixture of mathematical numerics and social ideals that engages an understanding of and appreciation for the concept. Each viewpoint represents an opportunity to fathom risk in its own context, contributing to the critical debate on risk management. The extent to which social factors influence risk decisions varied among banking institutions. Keywords: risk, risk management, social construction, banks
风险的社会建构:来自英国银行的证据
本研究提出了英国运营银行风险感知的经验证据,以及这些感知如何影响这些机构的风险过程。我们用社会建构主义来理解英国银行业管理者的观点。研究发现,英国经营银行的风险管理人员在风险认知上存在分歧。这种差异对于解释银行业风险处理方法和风险处理过程的差异至关重要。所提出的讨论是基于25个半结构化访谈的结果。数据中出现了两种不同的风险特征。将风险视为可计算、可测量的结构,可以管理、控制和验证。另一种将风险视为数学数字和社会理想的混合体,涉及对概念的理解和欣赏。每一种观点都代表了在其自身背景下理解风险的机会,有助于对风险管理的关键辩论。各银行机构对社会因素影响风险决策的程度各不相同。关键词:风险,风险管理,社会建设,银行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信