Patient experiences of Cytosponge: a qualitative study

IF 2.4 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Laura Jane Neilson, Rebecca C Fitzgerald, Jennifer Deane, Irene Debiram-Beecham, Halime Gulle, Colin Rees, Linda Sharp
{"title":"Patient experiences of Cytosponge: a qualitative study","authors":"Laura Jane Neilson, Rebecca C Fitzgerald, Jennifer Deane, Irene Debiram-Beecham, Halime Gulle, Colin Rees, Linda Sharp","doi":"10.1136/flgastro-2023-102484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Cytosponge is a novel technology for oesophageal pathology diagnosis. Uses include diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus and as a triage tool to prioritise upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patient experience is a key component of quality care. Previous work has developed endoscopy patient-reported experience measures. An appropriate tool to measure patient experience of Cytosponge is required. The aim of this work was to describe the patient experience of Cytosponge. Design/Method Individuals aged 18 years or over, who had undergone Cytosponge from September 2020 to March 2021, were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Themes were organised into two overarching areas relating to patient experiences and patient perceptions of the test. Results 19 patients underwent interview (aged 37–80 years, 13 male). In terms of patient experiences of Cytosponge, five themes were identified: emotional reaction; expectations; environment and physical process; sensory experience; communication and information. All themes were present across all procedural phases, aside from sensory experience which was only present during the test. With regard to perception of the test, two major themes were identified: test novelty (encompassing patient awareness of the test and reaction to the new test) and trusting the test results. Conclusion Patients must remain central to novel technologies such as Cytosponge. Measuring patient experience is essential to achieve that. This study demonstrates five major themes which describe the patient experience of this procedure. These have been used to adapt the Newcastle ENDOPREM for use in Cytosponge.","PeriodicalId":46937,"journal":{"name":"Frontline Gastroenterology","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontline Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2023-102484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Cytosponge is a novel technology for oesophageal pathology diagnosis. Uses include diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus and as a triage tool to prioritise upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patient experience is a key component of quality care. Previous work has developed endoscopy patient-reported experience measures. An appropriate tool to measure patient experience of Cytosponge is required. The aim of this work was to describe the patient experience of Cytosponge. Design/Method Individuals aged 18 years or over, who had undergone Cytosponge from September 2020 to March 2021, were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Themes were organised into two overarching areas relating to patient experiences and patient perceptions of the test. Results 19 patients underwent interview (aged 37–80 years, 13 male). In terms of patient experiences of Cytosponge, five themes were identified: emotional reaction; expectations; environment and physical process; sensory experience; communication and information. All themes were present across all procedural phases, aside from sensory experience which was only present during the test. With regard to perception of the test, two major themes were identified: test novelty (encompassing patient awareness of the test and reaction to the new test) and trusting the test results. Conclusion Patients must remain central to novel technologies such as Cytosponge. Measuring patient experience is essential to achieve that. This study demonstrates five major themes which describe the patient experience of this procedure. These have been used to adapt the Newcastle ENDOPREM for use in Cytosponge.
细胞海绵的患者经验:一项定性研究
目的细胞海绵是一种新的食管病理诊断技术。用途包括巴雷特食管的诊断,以及作为优先进行上消化道内窥镜检查的分类工具。患者体验是优质护理的关键组成部分。以前的工作已经开发了内窥镜检查患者报告的经验措施。需要一种合适的工具来测量患者对Cytosponge的体验。这项工作的目的是描述患者体验的细胞海绵。设计/方法在2020年9月至2021年3月期间接受过Cytosponge治疗的18岁或以上的个人被邀请参加半结构化访谈。采访录音,逐字抄写和匿名。进行了专题分析。主题被组织成与患者体验和患者对测试的看法有关的两个总体领域。结果随访19例患者,年龄37 ~ 80岁,男性13例。在使用Cytosponge的患者体验方面,确定了五个主题:情绪反应;预期;环境与物理过程;感官体验;通信和信息。所有的主题都出现在所有的程序阶段,除了只在测试期间出现的感官体验。关于测试的感知,确定了两个主要主题:测试新颖性(包括患者对测试的认识和对新测试的反应)和信任测试结果。结论必须以患者为中心,使用Cytosponge等新技术。衡量病人的经验对实现这一目标至关重要。本研究展示了五个主要主题,描述了该手术的患者体验。这些已被用于适应纽卡斯尔ENDOPREM用于细胞海绵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontline Gastroenterology
Frontline Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles that accelerate adoption of innovative and best practice in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. Frontline Gastroenterology is especially interested in articles on multidisciplinary research and care, focusing on both retrospective assessments of novel models of care as well as putative future directions of best practice. Specifically Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles in the domains of clinical quality, patient experience, service provision and medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信