Evaluating the performance of empirical models of total electron density and whistler-mode wave amplitude in the Earth’s inner magnetosphere

IF 2.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Qianli Ma, Xiangning Chu, Donglai Ma, Sheng Huang, Wen Li, Jacob Bortnik, Xiao-Chen Shen
{"title":"Evaluating the performance of empirical models of total electron density and whistler-mode wave amplitude in the Earth’s inner magnetosphere","authors":"Qianli Ma, Xiangning Chu, Donglai Ma, Sheng Huang, Wen Li, Jacob Bortnik, Xiao-Chen Shen","doi":"10.3389/fspas.2023.1232702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical models have been previously developed using the large dataset of satellite observations to obtain the global distributions of total electron density and whistler-mode wave power, which are important in modeling radiation belt dynamics. In this paper, we apply the empirical models to construct the total electron density and the wave amplitudes of chorus and hiss, and compare them with the observations along Van Allen Probes orbits to evaluate the model performance. The empirical models are constructed using the Hp30 and SME (or SML) indices. The total electron density model provides an overall high correlation coefficient with observations, while large deviations are found in the dynamic regions near the plasmapause or in the plumes. The chorus wave model generally agrees with observations when the plasma trough region is correctly modeled and for modest wave amplitudes of 10–100 pT. The model overestimates the wave amplitude when the chorus is not observed or weak, and underestimates the wave amplitude when a large-amplitude chorus is observed. Similarly, the hiss wave model has good performance inside the plasmasphere when modest wave amplitudes are observed. However, when the modeled plasmapause location does not agree with the observation, the model misidentifies the chorus and hiss waves compared to observations, and large modeling errors occur. In addition, strong (>200 pT) hiss waves are observed in the plumes, which are difficult to capture using the empirical model due to their transient nature and relatively poor sampling statistics. We also evaluate four metrics for different empirical models parameterized by different indices. Among the tested models, the empirical model considering a plasmapause and controlled by Hp* (the maximum Hp30 during the previous 24 h) and SME* (the maximum SME during the previous 3 h) or Hp* and SML has the best performance with low errors and high correlation coefficients. Our study indicates that the empirical models are applicable for predicting density and whistler-mode waves with modest power, but large errors could occur, especially near the highly-dynamic plasmapause or in the plumes.","PeriodicalId":46793,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1232702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empirical models have been previously developed using the large dataset of satellite observations to obtain the global distributions of total electron density and whistler-mode wave power, which are important in modeling radiation belt dynamics. In this paper, we apply the empirical models to construct the total electron density and the wave amplitudes of chorus and hiss, and compare them with the observations along Van Allen Probes orbits to evaluate the model performance. The empirical models are constructed using the Hp30 and SME (or SML) indices. The total electron density model provides an overall high correlation coefficient with observations, while large deviations are found in the dynamic regions near the plasmapause or in the plumes. The chorus wave model generally agrees with observations when the plasma trough region is correctly modeled and for modest wave amplitudes of 10–100 pT. The model overestimates the wave amplitude when the chorus is not observed or weak, and underestimates the wave amplitude when a large-amplitude chorus is observed. Similarly, the hiss wave model has good performance inside the plasmasphere when modest wave amplitudes are observed. However, when the modeled plasmapause location does not agree with the observation, the model misidentifies the chorus and hiss waves compared to observations, and large modeling errors occur. In addition, strong (>200 pT) hiss waves are observed in the plumes, which are difficult to capture using the empirical model due to their transient nature and relatively poor sampling statistics. We also evaluate four metrics for different empirical models parameterized by different indices. Among the tested models, the empirical model considering a plasmapause and controlled by Hp* (the maximum Hp30 during the previous 24 h) and SME* (the maximum SME during the previous 3 h) or Hp* and SML has the best performance with low errors and high correlation coefficients. Our study indicates that the empirical models are applicable for predicting density and whistler-mode waves with modest power, but large errors could occur, especially near the highly-dynamic plasmapause or in the plumes.
评价地球内磁层总电子密度和哨声波振幅经验模型的性能
利用大型卫星观测数据集建立了经验模型,以获得总电子密度和哨声模波能的全球分布,这对模拟辐射带动力学具有重要意义。在本文中,我们应用经验模型构建了总电子密度和合唱和嘶嘶的波幅,并将其与范艾伦探测器轨道上的观测结果进行了比较,以评估模型的性能。利用Hp30和SME(或SML)指数构建了实证模型。总电子密度模型总体上与观测值具有较高的相关系数,但在等离子体顶附近的动态区域或羽流中存在较大的偏差。当等离子体槽区正确建模和10-100 pT的中等波幅时,合唱波模型与观测结果基本一致。当合唱没有观测到或较弱时,模型高估了波幅,而当合唱振幅较大时,模型低估了波幅。同样,当观测到中等振幅的波时,等离子体层内的嘶嘶波模型也具有良好的性能。然而,当模拟的等离子体顶位置与观测值不一致时,模型与观测值相比会错误地识别合唱波和嘶嘶波,从而产生较大的建模误差。此外,在羽流中观测到强烈的(> 200pt)嘶嘶波,由于其瞬态性质和相对较差的采样统计量,使用经验模型难以捕获。我们还对由不同指标参数化的不同经验模型的四个指标进行了评估。在被检验的模型中,考虑等离子体ause并由Hp*(前24 h的最大Hp30)和SME*(前3 h的最大SME)或Hp*和SML控制的经验模型具有误差小、相关系数高的最佳性能。我们的研究表明,经验模型适用于中等功率的密度和哨声模式波的预测,但可能会出现较大的误差,特别是在高动态等离子体顶附近或羽流中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
363
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信