APPLICATION OF HYBRID DIBR-FUCOM-LMAW-BONFERRONI-GREY-EDAS MODEL IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING

IF 10.1 2区工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL

Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.22190/fume230824036r

Marko Radovanović, Darko Božanić, Duško Tešić, Adis Puška, Ibrahim M. Hezam, Chiranjibe Jana

{"title":"APPLICATION OF HYBRID DIBR-FUCOM-LMAW-BONFERRONI-GREY-EDAS MODEL IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING","authors":"Marko Radovanović, Darko Božanić, Duško Tešić, Adis Puška, Ibrahim M. Hezam, Chiranjibe Jana","doi":"10.22190/fume230824036r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of unmanned aerial vehicles for different purposes is a frequent topic of research. This paper presents a hybrid model of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) selection using the Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria (DIBR), Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) and grey - Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (G-EDAS) methods. The above-mentioned model is tested and confirmed in a case study. First of all, in the paper are defined the criteria conditioning the selection, and then with the help of experts and by applying the DIBR, FUCOM and LMAW methods, the weight coefficients of the criteria are determined. The final values of the weight coefficients are obtained by aggregating the values of the criteria weights from all the three methods using the Bonferroni aggregator. Ranking and selection of the optimal UAV from twenty-three defined alternatives is carried out using the G-EDAS method. Sensitivity analysis confirmed a high degree of consistency of the solutions obtained using other MCDM methods, as well as changing the criteria weight coefficients. The proposed model has proved to be stable; its application is also possible in other areas and it is a reliable tool for decision-makers during the selection process.","PeriodicalId":51338,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/fume230824036r","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of unmanned aerial vehicles for different purposes is a frequent topic of research. This paper presents a hybrid model of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) selection using the Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria (DIBR), Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) and grey - Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (G-EDAS) methods. The above-mentioned model is tested and confirmed in a case study. First of all, in the paper are defined the criteria conditioning the selection, and then with the help of experts and by applying the DIBR, FUCOM and LMAW methods, the weight coefficients of the criteria are determined. The final values of the weight coefficients are obtained by aggregating the values of the criteria weights from all the three methods using the Bonferroni aggregator. Ranking and selection of the optimal UAV from twenty-three defined alternatives is carried out using the G-EDAS method. Sensitivity analysis confirmed a high degree of consistency of the solutions obtained using other MCDM methods, as well as changing the criteria weight coefficients. The proposed model has proved to be stable; its application is also possible in other areas and it is a reliable tool for decision-makers during the selection process.

查看原文本刊更多论文

混合dibr-fucom-lmaw-bonferroni-grey-edas模型在多准则决策中的应用

选择不同用途的无人机是一个常见的研究课题。本文提出了一种基于排序准则定义相互关系(DIBR)、完全一致性方法(FUCOM)、加性权重对数方法(LMAW)和基于平均解距离的灰色评价(G-EDAS)方法的无人机选择混合模型。通过实例验证了上述模型的正确性。本文首先定义了影响选择的标准，然后在专家的帮助下，运用DIBR、FUCOM和LMAW方法确定了标准的权重系数。利用Bonferroni聚类器对三种方法得到的标准权重值进行聚合，得到最终的权重系数值。采用G-EDAS方法，从23种已定义的备选方案中对最优无人机进行排序和选择。敏感性分析证实了使用其他MCDM方法获得的解的高度一致性，以及改变标准权重系数。该模型已被证明是稳定的;它的应用也可能在其他领域，它是一个可靠的工具，为决策者在选择过程中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL-

CiteScore

14.40

自引率

2.50%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering (FU Mech Eng) is an open-access, peer-reviewed international journal published by the University of Niš in the Republic of Serbia. It publishes high-quality, refereed papers three times a year, encompassing original theoretical and/or practice-oriented research as well as extended versions of previously published conference papers. The journal's scope covers the entire spectrum of Mechanical Engineering. Papers undergo rigorous peer review to ensure originality, relevance, and readability, maintaining high publication standards while offering a timely, comprehensive, and balanced review process.