Reflections of Reason: Kant on Practical Judgement

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1017/s1369415423000328

Nicholas Dunn

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract My aim in this article is to provide an account of practical judgement, for Kant, that situates it within his theory of judgement as a whole – particularly, with regards to the distinction between the determining and reflecting use of judgement. I argue that practical judgement is a kind of determining judgement, but also one in which reflecting judgement plays a significant role. More specifically, I claim that practical judgement arises from the cooperation of the reflecting power of judgement with the faculty of reason – the former assisting the latter in the application of its principle. I conclude by considering a possible role for feeling in practical judgement.

查看原文本刊更多论文

理性反思:康德论实践判断

在这篇文章中，我的目的是为康德提供一种实践判断的解释，将其置于他的整体判断理论中，特别是关于判断的决定性和反射性使用之间的区别。实践判断是一种决定性的判断，但反映判断在其中起着重要的作用。更具体地说，我主张，实践判断源于判断的反映能力与理性能力的合作——前者帮助后者应用其原则。最后，我考虑了情感在实际判断中可能发挥的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.