Inscribing New Infrastructural Relations into the World

IF 0.7 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

RADICAL HISTORY REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1215/01636545-10637133

Wesley Attewell, Emily Mitchell-Eaton, Richard Nisa, Deborah Cowen, Laleh Khalili

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Scholars Deborah Cowen and Laleh Khalili engage in a lively discussion that explores the political stakes of infrastructural projects, the organizing logics that infrastructures advance and curtail, and the importance of highlighting the forms of labor, protest, and “making do” that are shaped by and in infrastructure’s long shadows. They also discuss the possibilities of world-building that move us away from the logics of spatial containment that dispossess and toward infrastructures of freedom, and how the struggles over the terms of these goals are inextricable from particular, local, intimate geographies.

查看原文本刊更多论文

将新的基础设施关系载入世界

学者Deborah Cowen和Laleh Khalili参与了一场生动的讨论，探讨了基础设施项目的政治利害关系，基础设施推进和限制的组织逻辑，以及强调劳动、抗议和“凑合”形式的重要性，这些形式是由基础设施的长期阴影塑造的。他们还讨论了世界建设的可能性，使我们远离剥夺自由的空间遏制逻辑，走向自由的基础设施，以及这些目标条款的斗争如何与特定的，局部的，亲密的地理密不可分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

RADICAL HISTORY REVIEW HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Individual subscribers and institutions with electronic access can view issues of Radical History Review online. If you have not signed up, review the first-time access instructions. For more than a quarter of a century, Radical History Review has stood at the point where rigorous historical scholarship and active political engagement converge. The journal is edited by a collective of historians—men and women with diverse backgrounds, research interests, and professional perspectives. Articles in RHR address issues of gender, race, sexuality, imperialism, and class, stretching the boundaries of historical analysis to explore Western and non-Western histories.