Equity, Imagination and Contested Narratives

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Adam Kirk-Smith
{"title":"Equity, Imagination and Contested Narratives","authors":"Adam Kirk-Smith","doi":"10.1007/s10991-023-09349-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Justice and the idea of the moral good pervade legal philosophy and underlie much of legal practice in different contexts. They are particularly resonant in the law of equity and the remedies it makes available. This article uses equity and conceptions of justice explores the role of narratives, fairness and values through the lens of the constructive trust, science fiction, temporality, the counterfactual imagination and creativity. This special edition’s theme of intersectionalities within law is a central analytical thread. Power dynamics and the place of equity in social dialogues around justice and fairness are set alongside socioeconomic vulnerability and othering in understanding how the law succeeds and fails in managing emerging inequalities. A lack of autonomy and voicelessness is often revealed through constrained access to law and legal services, as well as a more vulnerable relationship with time. Engaging the constructive trust provides interesting opportunities to examine the role of the trust within law, and through that explore wider discussions about the nature of legal systems and the remedies they may give rise to. Science fiction has always provided opportunities to create counterfactual worlds and engage hypothetical questions, many of which might illuminate contemporary debates or resonate forward to emerging concerns. Imagination is a central tenet of these worlds, as well as, increasingly, within law when faced with emerging technologies and the issues they present. The article concludes with an acknowledgement that such narratives and opportunities to question social norms can be a valuable tool in grounding societal change.","PeriodicalId":42661,"journal":{"name":"Liverpool Law Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liverpool Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-023-09349-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Justice and the idea of the moral good pervade legal philosophy and underlie much of legal practice in different contexts. They are particularly resonant in the law of equity and the remedies it makes available. This article uses equity and conceptions of justice explores the role of narratives, fairness and values through the lens of the constructive trust, science fiction, temporality, the counterfactual imagination and creativity. This special edition’s theme of intersectionalities within law is a central analytical thread. Power dynamics and the place of equity in social dialogues around justice and fairness are set alongside socioeconomic vulnerability and othering in understanding how the law succeeds and fails in managing emerging inequalities. A lack of autonomy and voicelessness is often revealed through constrained access to law and legal services, as well as a more vulnerable relationship with time. Engaging the constructive trust provides interesting opportunities to examine the role of the trust within law, and through that explore wider discussions about the nature of legal systems and the remedies they may give rise to. Science fiction has always provided opportunities to create counterfactual worlds and engage hypothetical questions, many of which might illuminate contemporary debates or resonate forward to emerging concerns. Imagination is a central tenet of these worlds, as well as, increasingly, within law when faced with emerging technologies and the issues they present. The article concludes with an acknowledgement that such narratives and opportunities to question social norms can be a valuable tool in grounding societal change.
公平、想象和争议叙事
正义和道德善的理念贯穿于法律哲学,并在不同背景下成为法律实践的基础。它们在衡平法及其提供的补救措施中尤其引起共鸣。本文运用公平和正义的概念,通过建设性信任、科幻、时间性、反事实想象和创造力的视角,探讨了叙事、公平和价值观的作用。这个特别版的主题是法律中的交叉性是一个中心的分析线索。权力动态和公平在围绕正义和公平的社会对话中的地位,与社会经济脆弱性和其他因素一起,在理解法律如何成功和失败地管理新出现的不平等方面。缺乏自主权和话语权往往表现为获得法律和法律服务的机会有限,以及与时间的关系更加脆弱。参与建设性信任提供了有趣的机会,可以检查信任在法律中的作用,并通过此探索有关法律制度性质及其可能产生的补救措施的更广泛讨论。科幻小说总是提供了创造反事实世界和提出假设性问题的机会,其中许多可能会启发当代的辩论,或者引起人们对新出现的问题的共鸣。想象力是这些世界的核心原则,在面对新兴技术及其带来的问题时,也越来越多地在法律范围内发挥作用。文章最后承认,这样的叙述和质疑社会规范的机会可以成为社会变革基础的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Liverpool Law Review is a tri-annual journal of contemporary domestic, European and international legal and social policy issues. The Journal aims to provide articles, commentaries and reviews across a wide range of theoretical and practical legal and social policy matters - including public law, private law, civil and criminal justice, international law, ethics and legal theory. The Journal has many international subscribers and regularly publishes important contributions from the U.K. and abroad. Articles and commentaries are published with sufficient speed to ensure that they are truly current.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信