Implementing team-based learning in a large environmental chemistry course and its impact on student learning and perceptions

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Priyanka Lekhi and Trish Varao-Sousa
{"title":"Implementing team-based learning in a large environmental chemistry course and its impact on student learning and perceptions","authors":"Priyanka Lekhi and Trish Varao-Sousa","doi":"10.1039/D3RP00158J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Team-based learning (TBL) is an instructional strategy where students participate in a set of activities including, applying course concepts to real-life case studies in instructor-selected teams. Here, we describe how TBL has been incorporated into a 3rd year, large, environmental chemistry course and investigate the benefits of using this strategy. A combination of pre/post survey and coursework data were analyzed to understand: (1) What were student perceptions of TBL? (2) How did using TBL to deliver content influence student learning, measured by exam performance? (3) How did students’ team skills evolve? Post-survey results indicate that students perceived TBL as enhancing their interest in course content, creating real-world connections, and most helpful for achieving practical critical thinking skills. Student performance on TBL-related final exam items was significantly better (Mean = 73%, SD = 21%) than non TBL-related final exam items, (Mean = 65%, SD = 21%), despite the level of complexity being similar between the two categories. The pre/post survey results indicate that, as compared to the start of term, students reported being significantly more comfortable expressing opinions in group meetings (<em>t</em>(78) = 4.25, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, Cohen's <em>d</em> = 0.48), and leading group discussions (<em>t</em>(78) = 3.11, <em>p</em> = 0.003, Cohen's <em>d</em> = 0.35), by the end of the term. The one-minute reflections (completed following the first and fifth TBL activities) indicated that there was a 14% increase (77% <em>vs.</em> 91%) in the number of students reporting on collective team decision making. This study demonstrates the wide-ranging positive impacts of TBL to student learning in a large Environmental Chemistry course all while enhancing active learning and applying chemistry concepts to relevant and real-life case studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 1","pages":" 193-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/rp/d3rp00158j","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Team-based learning (TBL) is an instructional strategy where students participate in a set of activities including, applying course concepts to real-life case studies in instructor-selected teams. Here, we describe how TBL has been incorporated into a 3rd year, large, environmental chemistry course and investigate the benefits of using this strategy. A combination of pre/post survey and coursework data were analyzed to understand: (1) What were student perceptions of TBL? (2) How did using TBL to deliver content influence student learning, measured by exam performance? (3) How did students’ team skills evolve? Post-survey results indicate that students perceived TBL as enhancing their interest in course content, creating real-world connections, and most helpful for achieving practical critical thinking skills. Student performance on TBL-related final exam items was significantly better (Mean = 73%, SD = 21%) than non TBL-related final exam items, (Mean = 65%, SD = 21%), despite the level of complexity being similar between the two categories. The pre/post survey results indicate that, as compared to the start of term, students reported being significantly more comfortable expressing opinions in group meetings (t(78) = 4.25, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.48), and leading group discussions (t(78) = 3.11, p = 0.003, Cohen's d = 0.35), by the end of the term. The one-minute reflections (completed following the first and fifth TBL activities) indicated that there was a 14% increase (77% vs. 91%) in the number of students reporting on collective team decision making. This study demonstrates the wide-ranging positive impacts of TBL to student learning in a large Environmental Chemistry course all while enhancing active learning and applying chemistry concepts to relevant and real-life case studies.

在大型环境化学课程中实施团队学习及其对学生学习和认知的影响
基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种教学策略,学生在教师选定的团队中参与一系列活动,包括将课程概念应用于现实生活中的案例研究。在此,我们介绍了如何将 TBL 纳入三年级的大型环境化学课程,并调查了使用该策略的益处。我们结合前后调查和课程作业数据进行了分析,以了解:(1) 学生对 TBL 的看法如何?(2) 以考试成绩衡量,使用 TBL 讲授内容对学生的学习有何影响?(3) 学生的团队技能是如何发展的?课后调查结果表明,学生认为 TBL 提高了他们对课程内容的兴趣,建立了与现实世界的联系,并且最有助于实现实用的批判性思维技能。学生在与 TBL 相关的期末考试项目上的成绩(平均值 = 73%,标准差 = 21%)明显好于与 TBL 无关的期末考试项目(平均值 = 65%,标准差 = 21%),尽管两类项目的复杂程度相似。前后调查结果显示,与学期开始时相比,到学期结束时,学生在小组会议中表达意见(t(78) = 4.25, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.48)和领导小组讨论(t(78) = 3.11, p = 0.003, Cohen's d = 0.35)时明显更加自如。一分钟反思(在第一和第五次 TBL 活动后完成)表明,报告团队集体决策的学生人数增加了 14%(77% 对 91%)。这项研究表明,在大型环境化学课程中,TBL 对学生的学习产生了广泛的积极影响,同时提高了学生的主动学习能力,并将化学概念应用到相关的现实案例研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信