Evaluation and comparison of sonographic difficult airway assessment parameters with clinical airway predictors

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
U Anushaprasath, Mritunjay Kumar, Manoj Kamal, Pradeep Bhatia, Narendra Kaloria, Bharat Paliwal, Sunit Kumar Gupta, Sadik Mohammed, Ankur Sharma
{"title":"Evaluation and comparison of sonographic difficult airway assessment parameters with clinical airway predictors","authors":"U Anushaprasath, Mritunjay Kumar, Manoj Kamal, Pradeep Bhatia, Narendra Kaloria, Bharat Paliwal, Sunit Kumar Gupta, Sadik Mohammed, Ankur Sharma","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_181_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and Aims: None of the clinical difficult airway predictors are 100% sensitive and specific. Ultrasound is being used for airway assessment, but there is still no established parameters or model to predict difficult laryngoscopy. This observational study was planned to determine the predictive ability of clinical and sonography-based airway assessment parameters for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation. Material and Methods: A total of 130 patients of 18–60 years of age undergoing elective intubation were included. The distribution of Cormack–Lehane (CL) grade and intubation difficulty scale (IDS) was correlated with the clinical and sonographic screening parameters for difficult airways. Results The prevalence of difficult laryngoscopy and difficult intubation in our study was 17.6% and 11.5%, respectively. Mallampati grade (MMG), upper lip bite test (ULBT), neck circumference, hyomental distance ratio (HMDR), tongue thickness (TT), skin to epiglottis/epiglottis to vocal cord distance (SED/E-VC), and mandibular condylar mobility (MCM) had significant association with the difficult laryngoscopy and MMG, neck circumference, SED, SED/E-VC; MCM had significant association with the difficult intubation. The combination of these predictors showed better diagnostic ability for difficult airways. Model 1 based on ultrasound parameters showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.848 (CI- 0.748-0.947, P value < 0.0001) and model 2 based on combined clinical and ultrasound parameters showed an AUC of 0.755 (95% CI- 0.631-0.879, P value < 0.0001). Conclusions: Ultrasound-based airway predictors can help in predicting difficult laryngoscopy and intubation along with the clinical parameters. Individual sonographic predictors have moderately satisfactory diagnostic profiles. The models based on combined tests have better diagnostic value.","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_181_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims: None of the clinical difficult airway predictors are 100% sensitive and specific. Ultrasound is being used for airway assessment, but there is still no established parameters or model to predict difficult laryngoscopy. This observational study was planned to determine the predictive ability of clinical and sonography-based airway assessment parameters for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation. Material and Methods: A total of 130 patients of 18–60 years of age undergoing elective intubation were included. The distribution of Cormack–Lehane (CL) grade and intubation difficulty scale (IDS) was correlated with the clinical and sonographic screening parameters for difficult airways. Results The prevalence of difficult laryngoscopy and difficult intubation in our study was 17.6% and 11.5%, respectively. Mallampati grade (MMG), upper lip bite test (ULBT), neck circumference, hyomental distance ratio (HMDR), tongue thickness (TT), skin to epiglottis/epiglottis to vocal cord distance (SED/E-VC), and mandibular condylar mobility (MCM) had significant association with the difficult laryngoscopy and MMG, neck circumference, SED, SED/E-VC; MCM had significant association with the difficult intubation. The combination of these predictors showed better diagnostic ability for difficult airways. Model 1 based on ultrasound parameters showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.848 (CI- 0.748-0.947, P value < 0.0001) and model 2 based on combined clinical and ultrasound parameters showed an AUC of 0.755 (95% CI- 0.631-0.879, P value < 0.0001). Conclusions: Ultrasound-based airway predictors can help in predicting difficult laryngoscopy and intubation along with the clinical parameters. Individual sonographic predictors have moderately satisfactory diagnostic profiles. The models based on combined tests have better diagnostic value.
超声困难气道评估参数与临床气道预测指标的评价与比较
背景与目的:没有一种临床困难的气道预测因子是100%敏感和特异性的。超声被用于气道评估,但仍没有确定的参数或模型来预测困难的喉镜检查。本观察性研究旨在确定临床和基于超声的气道评估参数对困难喉镜检查和插管的预测能力。材料与方法:共纳入130例年龄18-60岁的择期插管患者。Cormack-Lehane (CL)分级和插管困难量表(IDS)的分布与困难气道的临床和超声筛查参数相关。结果本研究中喉镜检查和插管困难的发生率分别为17.6%和11.5%。Mallampati分级(MMG)、上唇咬合试验(ULBT)、颈围、眼膜距离比(HMDR)、舌厚(TT)、皮肤到会厌/会厌到声带距离(SED/E-VC)、下颌髁活动度(MCM)与喉镜检查困难、MMG、颈围、SED、SED/E-VC有显著相关性;MCM与插管困难有显著相关性。这些预测因子的组合显示出对困难气道的更好的诊断能力。基于超声参数的模型1曲线下面积(AUC)为0.848 (CI- 0.748 ~ 0.947, P值<0.0001),基于临床和超声综合参数的模型2的AUC为0.755 (95% CI- 0.631-0.879, P值<0.0001)。结论:基于超声的气道预测指标可以帮助预测困难的喉镜检查和插管以及临床参数。个别超声预测有中等满意的诊断概况。基于组合试验的模型具有较好的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信