Assessing foliar fungicides for soybean disease management and yield in Indiana

IF 1.7 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Mariama T. Brown, Su Shim, Camila Rocco Da Silva, Kaitlin G. Waibel, Darcy E. P. Telenko
{"title":"Assessing foliar fungicides for soybean disease management and yield in Indiana","authors":"Mariama T. Brown, Su Shim, Camila Rocco Da Silva, Kaitlin G. Waibel, Darcy E. P. Telenko","doi":"10.1094/php-05-23-0046-rs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foliar diseases can significantly impact soybean in Indiana and fungicides can be an effective management tool to protect yield against disease. Fourteen foliar fungicide products were evaluated for efficacy on soybean foliar diseases and yield in ten field trials from 2019 to 2021 in Indiana. Fungicides were applied at their recommended rates in a single application at the beginning pod (R3) growth stage. Cercospora leaf blight (Cercospora spp.), brown spot (Septoria glycines Hemmi), and frogeye leaf spot (Cercospora sojina Hara) were the most prominent foliar diseases observed in the trials. Under low to moderate Cercospora leaf blight disease pressure, there were no significant differences between foliar fungicides and the nontreated control averaged across all site-years. In contrast, all foliar fungicides significantly suppressed brown spot from 69 to 92% relative to the nontreated control. Only bixafen + flutriafol and azoxystrobin + pydiflumetofen + propiconazole significantly suppressed frogeye leaf spot severity over the nontreated control. Foliar fungicide applications did not significantly increase yield over the nontreated control across all site-years. Therefore, under low to moderate foliar disease risk, fungicide applications may not be warranted in Indiana. Growers should continue to scout soybean fields prior to the beginning pod (R3) growth stage, then make an informed, sustainable decision to use a fungicide for disease management.","PeriodicalId":20251,"journal":{"name":"Plant Health Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Health Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-05-23-0046-rs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foliar diseases can significantly impact soybean in Indiana and fungicides can be an effective management tool to protect yield against disease. Fourteen foliar fungicide products were evaluated for efficacy on soybean foliar diseases and yield in ten field trials from 2019 to 2021 in Indiana. Fungicides were applied at their recommended rates in a single application at the beginning pod (R3) growth stage. Cercospora leaf blight (Cercospora spp.), brown spot (Septoria glycines Hemmi), and frogeye leaf spot (Cercospora sojina Hara) were the most prominent foliar diseases observed in the trials. Under low to moderate Cercospora leaf blight disease pressure, there were no significant differences between foliar fungicides and the nontreated control averaged across all site-years. In contrast, all foliar fungicides significantly suppressed brown spot from 69 to 92% relative to the nontreated control. Only bixafen + flutriafol and azoxystrobin + pydiflumetofen + propiconazole significantly suppressed frogeye leaf spot severity over the nontreated control. Foliar fungicide applications did not significantly increase yield over the nontreated control across all site-years. Therefore, under low to moderate foliar disease risk, fungicide applications may not be warranted in Indiana. Growers should continue to scout soybean fields prior to the beginning pod (R3) growth stage, then make an informed, sustainable decision to use a fungicide for disease management.
评价叶面杀菌剂对印第安纳州大豆病害管理和产量的影响
叶面病害对印第安那州的大豆有重大影响,杀菌剂可作为有效的管理工具来保护大豆产量。2019 - 2021年,在印第安纳州进行了10项田间试验,评价了14种叶面杀菌剂对大豆叶面病害的防治效果和产量。在荚果生长初期按推荐用量单次施用杀菌剂。叶枯病(Cercospora spp.)、褐斑病(Septoria glycines Hemmi)和蛙斑病(Cercospora sojina Hara)是试验中观察到的最突出的叶面病害。在低至中度斑孢叶枯病压力下,各立地年平均叶面杀菌剂与未处理对照间无显著差异。与未处理对照相比,所有叶面杀菌剂对褐斑病的抑制率为69% ~ 92%。与未处理对照相比,只有bixafen +氟triafol和azoxystrobin + pydiflumetofen + propiconazole显著抑制了蛙眼叶斑病的严重程度。在所有立地年份中,叶面施用杀菌剂与未处理对照相比没有显著提高产量。因此,在低至中度叶面疾病风险下,在印第安纳州可能不需要使用杀菌剂。种植者应在豆荚开始(R3)生长阶段之前继续侦察大豆田,然后做出明智的、可持续的决定,使用杀菌剂进行病害管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Health Progress
Plant Health Progress Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Plant Health Progress, a member journal of the Plant Management Network, is a multidisciplinary science-based journal covering all aspects of applied plant health management in agriculture and horticulture. Both peer-reviewed and fully citable, the journal is a credible online-only publication. Plant Health Progress is a not-for-profit collaborative endeavor of the plant health community at large, serving practitioners worldwide. Its primary goal is to provide a comprehensive one-stop Internet resource for plant health information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信